Heath v. Heath, 45022
| Decision Date | 04 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 45022,45022 |
| Parties | HEATH v. HEATH. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Martin L. Cowen III, Cowen & Cowen, Jonesboro, for Ida Mae heath.
Charles Edward Heath, pro se.
We are called upon to determine whether a valid foreign divorce decree bars a Georgia action for alimony and property division when the Georgia party has no contacts in the foreign state. The trial court in this case dismissed the Georgia action and we affirm but conclude that the dismissal does not bar a new proceeding for alimony and property division in Georgia.
The parties married in 1983 and lived together in Georgia until they separated in 1985. The husband now lives in North Carolina and the wife resides in Clayton County, Georgia. The husband filed a divorce action in North Carolina in 1986, serving the wife by certified mail. She did not answer or otherwise submit herself to the jurisdiction of the court and has never lived in North Carolina. The action in that state resulted in a divorce decree with no treatment being given to the issues of alimony or property division.
After the filing of the North Carolina suit, but before the entry of the decree, the wife filed an action in Georgia praying for divorce, alimony and property division. The Georgia trial court granted the husband's motion to dismiss on the grounds that the North Carolina divorce bars a divorce action in Georgia. The court's order specifically says the dismissal is with prejudice.
We agree that the North Carolina decree is entitled to full faith and credit and that the issue of divorce is moot and should be dismissed. We do not, however, agree that the North Carolina divorce action bars a suit for alimony and property division in Georgia. If a foreign court has in personam jurisdiction over the defendant, it may adjudicate property rights such as alimony, child support, and title to real property. Whitaker v. Whitaker, 237 Ga. 895, 230 S.E.2d 486 (1976). Such a right is afforded by our domestic long-arm statute under OCGA § 9-10-91(5) provided the defendant has had sufficient minimum contacts with the state. From the record it appears that because of husband's contacts with the state and wife's residency the Georgia court has in personam jurisdiction over both parties and may decide their property rights. OCGA § 19-6-27 allows a Georgia resident to pursue a claim for alimony after a divorce has been granted in another state under certain...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Abernathy v. Abernathy
...at 2584.14 Id. at 207, 212, 97 S.Ct. at 2581, 2584.15 495 U.S. 604, 621, 110 S.Ct. 2105, 2116, 109 L.Ed.2d 631 (1990).16 257 Ga. 777, 778, 364 S.E.2d 272 (1988).17 Id. at 778, 364 S.E.2d 272 (Emphasis supplied.)18 261 Ga. 600, 409 S.E.2d 204 (1991).19 See Frasca v. Frasca, 254 Ga. 532, 535(......
-
Mbatha v. Cutting
...of one spouse within a State gives power to that State ... to dissolve a marriage wheresoever contracted"). Compare Heath v. Heath , 257 Ga. 777, 364 S.E.2d 272 (1988) (Georgia trial court properly dismissed divorce petition of wife, a Georgia resident, where husband, a North Carolina resid......
-
Hildebrant v. Hildebrant
...237 Ga. at 897-898, 230 S.E.2d 486; Straus v. Straus, 260 Ga. 327, 328-329(2), 393 S.E.2d 248 (1990). 3. Relying on Heath v. Heath, 257 Ga. 777, 778, 364 S.E.2d 272 (1988), Mrs. Hildebrant contends that, even if the Texas judgment is entitled to full faith and credit, she is entitled to see......
-
Barolia v. Pirani, A02A2012.
...a nonresident spouse who obtained a divorce decree in another state without personally serving the resident. See Heath v. Heath, 257 Ga. 777, 778, 364 S.E.2d 272 (1988). The action before us does not involve alimony or child support, but the equitable division of marital assets, which is no......