Heath v. Norwood
Decision Date | 05 September 2018 |
Docket Number | Case No. 17-3114-DDC |
Citation | 325 F.Supp.3d 1183 |
Parties | Glenn A. HEATH, Petitioner, v. Joe NORWOOD, Secretary of Corrections, et al., Respondents. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
Glenn A. Heath, Lansing, KS, pro se.
Kristafer R. Ailslieger, Office of Attorney General, Topeka, KS, for Respondents.
This matter comes before the court on Glenn A. Heath's pro se1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Relief (Doc. 1), respondents' Answer and Return (Doc. 16), and petitioner's Traverse (Doc. 19). Generally, petitioner attacks respondent the Kansas Prison Review Board's decision to deny petitioner parole on three grounds: lack of due process, lack of equal protection, and violation of his First Amendment rights. For reasons explained below, the court denies the Petition.
The Kansas Court of Appeals summarized the facts of petitioner's state-court case this way:
Heath v. Roberts , ––– Kan.App.2d ––––, 386 P.3d 926, 2016 WL 7324457, at *1–2 (Kan. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2016) (unpublished table decision) (internal citations, alterations, and quotation marks omitted).
Petitioner timely appealed the Kansas state district court's decision to the Kansas Court of Appeals. Id. at *2. In his appeal, petitioner raised a variety of issues. They included the due process, equal protection, and First Amendment issues he raises here. In the end, the Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision. Id. at *4. On April 26, 2017, the Kansas Supreme Court denied review. From the date the Review Board denied petitioner parole, he has served 21 years in prison.
Petitioner is not the only person convicted of felony-murder for the death of a child whose parole status the Review Board considered recently. The Review Board recently granted two other inmates—Vincent Altum and Kelly Williams—parole. Mr. Altum was convicted of killing his girlfriend's 14-month old son after he struck the child multiple times in the head and shook him. Mr. Williams was convicted of killing his girlfriend's three-year old daughter after violently shaking her and beating her. Both inmates had disciplinary actions taken against them during their time in prison. The Review Board released Mr. Altum on parole after he served 18 years. Mr. Williams served 19 years before the Review Board granted him parole. The Review Board also has released a prisoner who, like petitioner, maintains that he is innocent of the crime for which he was convicted. In particular, Mr. Craig Wilson was convicted of sodomizing a child.2 While the court is not certain how long Mr. Wilson spent in prison, he has served more time than petitioner.3
Three months after the Kansas Supreme Court denied review of the Kansas Court of Appeals decision, petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus with our court. While his filings are difficult to follow at times, the Petition alleges three grounds for support. First, it argues that the Review Board4 violated petitioner's due process and equal protection rights. Second, it contends that petitioner has a contractual right to parole under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 75-5201, et seq. and 22-3717(g)(2) and (h). And thus, it contends, the Review Board must support its decision with evidence. Failure to do so, it argues, amounts to a due process violation. Third, petitioner argues that the Review Board's actions were arbitrary and capricious. He also raises a ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gorenc v. Proverbs
...has a protectable liberty or property right when he has a legitimate claim of entitlement to something ...." Heath v. Norwood , 325 F. Supp. 3d 1183, 1191 (D. Kan. 2018) (citations and internal quotations marks omitted); cf. Bd. of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth , 408 U.S. 564, 575, 92 S.C......
-
Gorenc v. Klaassen
...a person has a protectable liberty or property right when he has a legitimate claim of entitlement to something." Heath v. Norwood , 325 F. Supp. 3d 1183, 1191 (D. Kan. 2018) (internal quotations and citations omitted). "A liberty interest may arise from the Constitution itself, by reason o......
-
Lewis v. Wyandotte Cnty. Jail
... ... exist simply because it is not listed in the ... Constitution.” See Heath v. Norwood, 325 ... F.Supp.3d 1183, 1192-93 (D. Kan. Sept. 5, 2018). But ... Plaintiff does not explain how the Ninth Amendment is ... ...
-
Shields v. Smith
...to a habeas corpus petition not [brought under § 2254]." Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 1(b); see also Heath v. Norwood, 325 F. Supp. 3d 1183, 1197 n. 9 (D. Kan. 2018). The Court elects to do so ...