Hefner v. State
| Decision Date | 12 February 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. A96A2392,A96A2392 |
| Citation | 224 Ga.App. 612,481 S.E.2d 599 |
| Parties | , 97 FCDR 559 HEFNER v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Evan L. Stapler, Bremen, for appellant.
James R. Osborne, Dist. Atty., Fred A. Lane, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
A Haralson County jury convicted James Edward Hefner on two counts of armed robbery that arose from his 1995 holdup of the Corinth Quik Stop. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a similar transaction and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
1. In two enumerations of error, Hefner contends the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We apply the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) and view the evidence with all reasonable inferences made, and all issues of weight and credibility resolved, in favor of the verdict. Patterson v. State, 181 Ga.App. 68, 69(2), 351 S.E.2d 503 (1986).
Hefner's accomplice, Wolf, walked into the Quik Stop around 7:00 p.m. on August 28. Brandishing a sawed-off shotgun, he took money from the cash register and a ring and bracelets from the clerk. Wolf, who pled guilty to the crime, implicated Hefner as the driver of the getaway car. Although no independent witness placed Hefner at the crime scene, two witnesses reported seeing a man slouched down in the driver's seat of an older, metallic blue or silver car parked near the store at the time of the robbery. Approximately seven hours later, after another convenience store holdup, police apprehended Hefner, accompanied by Wolf, driving a car matching the witnesses' description. Inside the car police found a sawed-off shotgun, money, and the jewelry stolen from the Quik Stop's clerk. Hefner admitted to police he had been with Wolf since 7:00 p.m. but said he was too intoxicated to remember what happened.
Because only slight evidence is needed to corroborate an accomplice's incriminating testimony, the evidence that Hefner had been with Wolf at 7:00 p.m., that he was found driving a car matching one seen at the crime scene, and that he was in possession of a shotgun and items stolen from the Quik Stop sufficiently supports Wolf's testimony and the convictions. See Ladson v. State, 248 Ga. 470, 475(5), 285 S.E.2d 508 (1981) (). Under these circumstances, the jury was entitled to infer that Hefner participated in the crime. See Norris v. State, 220 Ga.App. 87, 89(2), 469 S.E.2d 214 (1996) ().
2. The similar transaction that Hefner contends the trial court erroneously admitted was a convenience store holdup that occurred in the early morning hours of August 29, 1995, moments before Hefner was arrested. The trial court admitted this crime to show Hefner's "bent of mind and course of conduct." ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Herndon v. State
...connection to it,' " allowing the admission of the evidence for jury consideration under appropriate instructions. Hefner v. State, 224 Ga.App. 612, 614(2), 481 S.E.2d 599. 8. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting in evidence a videotape of a police detective's interview......
-
Slaughter v. State
...is circumstantial, it is legally sufficient." Edmond v. State, 267 Ga. 285, 287(2), 476 S.E.2d 731 (1996). See Hefner v. State, 224 Ga.App. 612, 613(1), 481 S.E.2d 599 (1997); Moore v. State, 224 Ga.App. 797, 798(1), 481 S.E.2d 892 There was sufficient corroborating evidence of Slaughter's ......
-
Burks v. State
...of [robbery] beyond a reasonable doubt." Carter v. State, 224 Ga.App. 217(1), 480 S.E.2d 266 (1997). See also Hefner v. State, 224 Ga.App. 612, 613(1), 481 S.E.2d 599 (1997); OCGA § 2. Alls contends that the trial court erred in admitting photographs of the van, asserting that no proper fou......
- U.B. Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. Vision Intern., Inc., A96A2374