Herbert v. Thursby

Decision Date20 November 1933
PartiesHERBERT v. THURSBY et al.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1933.

En Banc.

Bill of complaint by John T. Herbert against Ben D. Thursby and others, constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Fla., and Volusia County, a political subdivision of the state of Florida. From a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, complainant appeals.

Reversed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Volusia County; M G. Rowe, Judge.

COUNSEL

H. E Couchman and Leon J. C. Harton, both of Daytona Beach, for appellant.

W. J Gardiner, of Daytona Beach, for appellees.

OPINION

WHITFIELD Justice.

In a bill of complaint brought by a citizen taxpayer of Volusia county, Fla., it is in effect alleged that the county commissioners of the courty, in order to secure an armory for appropriate use in the county, propose to borrow from the authorities of the United States government $52,500 to be used in providing such armory;

'That the County of Volusia now owns and has owned for many years last past the following described property located in Volusia County, Florida, to-wit:

'The West Seventy-five (75) feet of Lot One (1), Block Nine (9) according to Hodgman's Map of Daytona, of record in the Public Records of Volusia County, Florida.
'That the said property is now vacant and unused property, but was until about seven years since used as and for an Armory site; that officers and members of Battery C, 265th Coast Artillery, Florida National Guard, are now attempting to have the City of Daytona Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, convey to Volusia County and/or to the United States of America a fraction or portion of the City Island for a site for the construction of said Armory. That the City Island is an island located in the Halifax River, a river that divides the said City of Daytona Beach, and is owned by the said City of Daytona Beach; that if the said portion or fraction of the said City Island is conveyed by the said City of Daytona Beach to the County of Volusia, then your Plaintiff believes and so alleges that the said County of Volusia will convey the same to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America for the purpose herein alleged; that the members of the City Commission of the said City of Daytona Beach are now favorably considering the request of the said officers and members of said Battery C, 265th Coast Artillery, Florida National Guard, to convey a fraction or portion of the said City Island either to the said County of Volusia or to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America for the purposes herein alleged; that the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, intended and will evidence said loan, if granted, by a note or indenture of indebtedness obligating Volusia County to repay said sum of Fifty-two Thousand Five Hundred ($52,500.00) Dollars to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America with interest thereon at the rate of four per cent per annum until paid, or in lieu thereof deed to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America the said West Seventy-five (75) feet of Lot One (1), Block Nine (9), according to Hodgman's Map of Daytona, of record in the Public Records of Volusia County, Florida, or said fraction or portion of the said City Island as and for an armory site for the construction of said Armory by the said Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America. That if the said West Seventy-five (75) feet of Lot One (1), Block Nine (9), according to Hodgman's Map of Daytona, of record in the Public Records of Volusia County, Florida, and/or the said fraction or portion of the said City Island is conveyed to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America and an Armory constructed thereon in accordance with the terms and provisions of said application, then and in that event said Volusia County by and through its Board of County Commissioners will lease from the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America such Armory and the land upon which it is constructed as and for an Armory for the said Battery C, 265th Coast Artillery Florida National Guard. That the said lease would have to be executed and the terms and provisions thereof be in accordance with the terms and provisions of the said National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195), and would provide for a rental to be paid for such Armory by the County of Volusia to the said Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America over a period of not more than thirty years. That the said rental for the said Armory would be paid in monthly or annual installments until said total sum of Fifty-two Thousand Five Hundred ($52,500.00) Dollars was paid when the said Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America would convey the said Armory and the land upon which it was constructed to the County of Volusia without any further payment of money or consideration. That the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, will either loan or borrow the said sum of Fifty-two Thousand Five Hundred ($52,500.00) Dollars from the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America and evidence said loan by the execution and delivery of note and/or other evidence of indebtedness, or in lieu thereof convey the said West Seventy-five (75) feet of Lot One (1), Block Nine (9), according to Hodgman's Map of Daytona of record in the Public Records of Volusia County, Florida, or the said fraction or portion of the said City Island to the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and/or the United States of America and then enter into an indenture of lease providing for the leasing of either of said pieces of property after the construction of the said Armory thereon and agreeing to pay therefor an annual rental over a period of years, the total rental to be the sum of Fifty-two Thousand Five Hundred ($52,500.00) Dollars, plus interest at the rate of four per cent per annum; that the action of the said Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, as herein alleged is to be taken and had pursuant to the said National Industrial Recovery Act, and that the said Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, will execute and deliver any and all necessary deeds and/or leases and/or indentures necessary and requisite to secure the said sum of Fifty-two Thousand Five Hundred ($52,500.00) Dollars with which to construct the said Armory
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. City of Miami
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 19, 1933
    ...Miami, 100 Fla. 1388, 131 So. 143; Sullivan v. City of Tampa, 101 Fla. 298, 134 So. 211; Sholtz v. McCord (Fla.) 150 So. 234; Herbert v. Thursby (Fla.) 151 So. 385 filed November 20, 1933, not yet reported [in State Report]). Appellant Diver contends that, under section 6 of article 9 of th......
  • State v. Citrus County
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • September 27, 1934
    ......636; Savage v. Board of Public Inst. Hillsborough County, 101 Fla. 1362, 133 So. 341;. Sholtz v. McCord, 112 Fla. 248, 150 So. 234;. Herbert v. Thursby, 112 Fla. 826, 151 So. 385;. State v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6;. City of Daytona Beach v. State, 101 Fla. 560, 132. ......
  • Williams v. Town of Dunnellon
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • August 3, 1936
    ...... 1930, relative to the issue of bonds by counties, districts,. and municipalities. Herbert v. Thursby, 112 Fla. 826, 151 So. 385; Boykin v. Town of River Junction,. 121 Fla. 902, 164 So. 558; Kathleen Citrus Land Co. v. City of Lakeland ......
  • Boykin v. Town of River Junction
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 12, 1935
    ...... article 9 of the Constitution. State v. City of. Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6, supra; Sholtz v. McCord, 112 Fla. 248, 150 So. 234; Herbert v. Thursby, 112 Fla. 826, 151 So. 385; Martin v. Dade. Muck Land Co., 95 Fla. 530, 116 So. 449; In re. Advisory Opinion to Governor, 94 Fla. 967, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT