Hersey v. State, 5D01-2314.

Decision Date26 July 2002
Docket NumberNo. 5D01-2314.,5D01-2314.
Citation831 So.2d 679
PartiesScott HERSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise O. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

HARRIS, J.

Hersey appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon, aggravated battery, and aggravated assault. We affirm his conviction. The State concedes that the scoresheet used at sentencing was in error. We remand for re-sentencing under a corrected scoresheet without consideration of the "three-strike" enhancement. See Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)

.

As did the court in Taylor, we certify the issue of the constitutionality of the amendment to the supreme court.

AFFIRMED.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The State has moved for rehearing on the basis that the enactment of chapter 02-210, Laws of Florida, cured chapter 99-188's constitutional infirmity. The State claims that this curative provision applies retroactively. We agree that under the reasoning of Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977), it does. We grant rehearing and affirm the sentence below.

REHEARING GRANTED and SENTENCE BELOW AFFIRMED.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

We grant appellant's motion for certification and certify the issue of the constitutionality of the curative effect of chapter 02-210, Laws of Florida as it relates to chapter 99-188 to the supreme court as one of exceptional importance.

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
52 cases
  • Franklin v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 30, 2004
    ...clause. 7. The Fifth District has agreed with the Second District that the Act violates article III, section 6. See Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Taylor), receded from in part by Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 8. The Fourth and First Districts have ......
  • Green v. State, 2D02-2430.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 2003
    ...District, in Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2162, ___ So.2d ___, 2002 WL 31202145 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct.4, 2002), and Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (on grant of rehearing), has held that the curative provisions of chapter 02-2102 apply retroactively. The Fourth Distri......
  • State v. Franklin
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 2003
    ...Carlson v. State, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. 5th DCA Case no. 5D01-3089, opinion filed, October 4, 2002)[27 FLW D2162]; and Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction filed, No. SC02-2630 (Fla. Dec. 16, 2002), that the separate reenactment of th......
  • Hernandez-Molina v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 2003
    ...the Legislature's retroactive application of the re-enactment cure in Chapter 02-212, Laws of Florida, as approved by Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), closed the window For reasons expressed in Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we hold that retroactive app......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT