Hershberger by Hershberger v. Schwartz

Decision Date19 November 1993
Citation198 A.D.2d 859,604 N.Y.S.2d 428
PartiesMichael HERSHBERGER, an Infant, by his Parent and Natural Guardian Brenda HERSHBERGER, and Brenda Hershberger, Individually, Respondents, v. Walter SCHWARTZ, Gloria La Borde, David La Borde, Nathaniel La Borde, Nicholas La Borde and Travis La Borde, Defendants. Gloria LA BORDE, David La Borde, Nathaniel La Borde, Nicholas La Borde and Travis La Borde, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Gough, Skipworth, Summers, Eves & Trevett, P.C. by Louis Cristo, Rochester, for third-party defendant-appellant.

Hall & Karz (Samuel M. Hall, of counsel), Canandaigua, for third-party plaintiffs-respondents, La Borde.

Mousaw, Vigdor, Reeves, Heilbronner & Kroll, by Richard Dollinger, Rochester, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before CALLAHAN, J.P., and PINE, BALIO, DOERR, and BOOMER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Supreme Court properly determined that third-party defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Nationwide) has a duty to defend its insureds in the underlying personal injury action alleging negligent entrustment of a dangerous instrumentality to an infant (see, Cone v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 75 N.Y.2d 747, 551 N.Y.S.2d 891, 551 N.E.2d 92; see also, Technicon Elecs. Corp. v. American Home Assur. Co., 74 N.Y.2d 66, 73-74, 544 N.Y.S.2d 531, 542 N.E.2d 1048; Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Gillette Co., 64 N.Y.2d 304, 310, 486 N.Y.S.2d 873, 476 N.E.2d 272; International Paper Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 35 N.Y.2d 322, 325-326, 361 N.Y.S.2d 873, 320 N.E.2d 619). The court erred, however, in awarding third-party plaintiffs costs and attorney's fees incurred in bringing the third-party action. An insured is not entitled to recover the costs and expenses of bringing an affirmative action to settle his rights, but may recover only when he has been cast in a defensive posture by the action of an insurer in an effort to absolve itself from its policy obligations (Mighty Midgets v. Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12, 21, 416 N.Y.S.2d 559, 389 N.E.2d 1080; Johnson v. General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 N.Y.2d 42, 50, 298 N.Y.S.2d 937, 246 N.E.2d 713; AFA Protective Sys. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 157 A.D.2d 683, 686, 549 N.Y.S.2d 783). The court also erred in denying Nationwide's motion to dismiss the cross claim of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs cannot maintain a direct claim against Nationwide. Plaintiffs are strangers to the homeowners' insurance policy and may not seek enforcement of the insurer's obligation...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Nap, Inc. v. Shuttletex, Inc., 98 Civ. 7776(VM).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 11, 2000
    ...1998); Clarendon Place Corp. v. Landmark Insurance Co., 182 A.D.2d 6, 587 N.Y.S.2d 311 (1st Dep't 1992); Hershberger v. Schwartz, 198 A.D.2d 859, 604 N.Y.S.2d 428 (4th Dep't 1993). NAP counters that the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, through which it seeks relief agains......
  • Vargas v. Boston Chicken, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 27, 2003
    ...Apartments, L.P. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 284 A.D.2d 975, 976, 726 N.Y.S.2d 901 (4th Dep't 2001); Hershberger v. Schwartz, 198 A.D.2d 859, 860, 604 N.Y.S.2d 428 (4th Dep't 1993). Although the Third Department has not addressed this precise issue, it has in dicta cited, with approval, to......
  • Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Mitlof, 99 CIV. 9841(WCC).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • December 15, 2000
    ...mere `strangers to the insurance contracts at issue.'") (citing Clarendon, 587 N.Y.S.2d at 312). 5. See Hershberger v. Schwartz, 198 A.D.2d 859, 604 N.Y.S.2d 428, 429 (4th Dep't 1993) ("Plaintiffs are strangers to the [insured's] ... policy and may not seek enforcement of the insurer's obli......
  • Watson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 13, 1998
    ...195 A.D.2d 425, 600 N.Y.S.2d 936; Sincerbeaux v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 206 A.D.2d 907, 614 N.Y.S.2d 836; Hershberger v. Schwartz, 198 A.D.2d 859, 604 N.Y.S.2d 428). In our opinion, the Clarendon Place rule, followed in the Latoni case, is not supported by the language of the statute......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT