Hertz v. Rozzi

• Decision Date: 13 March 1989
• Citation: 148 A.D.2d 535,538 N.Y.S.2d 867
• Parties: In the Matter of Ronald G. HERTZ, Appellant, v. Samuel J. ROZZI, etc., et al., Respondents.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 867

538 N.Y.S.2d 867

148 A.D.2d 535

In the Matter of Ronald G. HERTZ, Appellant, v. Samuel J. ROZZI, etc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division,

Second Department.

March 13, 1989.

Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C., Little Neck (Raymond E. Kerno, of counsel, Lee M. Nigen, on the brief), for appellant.

Edward T. O'Brien, County Atty., Mineola (Patricia M. Carroll, of counsel, Maryann K. Murtha, on the brief), for respondents.

Before MANGANO, J.P., and BROWN, LAWRENCE, KOOPER and HARWOOD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated December 2, 1986, which denied the petitioner termination pay and pay for unused sick time, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated September 10, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision converting the proceeding into an action for a declaratory judgment (see, CPLR 103[c] ), with the petition deemed the complaint, and declaring that pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the respondent County of Nassau and the Nassau County Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, the petitioner is not entitled to termination pay or pay for unused sick time; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that a CPLR article 78 proceeding is not the proper vehicle to resolve contractual rights (see, Automated Ticket Systems v. Quinn, 70 A.D.2d 726, 416 N.Y.S.2d 864; Matter of Mohican Cable TV Corp. v. Cronin, 34 A.D.2d 692, 309 N.Y.S.2d 480; Matter of Corbeau Constr. Corp. v. Board of Educ., 32 A.D.2d 958, 959, 302 N.Y.S.2d 940). That a proceeding was brought in an improper form does not, however, necessarily warrant dismissal since CPLR 103(c) authorizes the court to "make whatever order is required for its proper prosecution" (see, Matter of Corbeau Constr. Corp. v. Board of Educ., supra ). In such a case, the matter may be converted into one for a declaratory judgment, if appropriate (see, Matter of Concord Realty v. City of New York, 30 N.Y.2d 308, 311, 333 N.Y.S.2d 161, 284 N.E.2d 148).

The petitioner herein, a police officer whose separation from service was due to an accidental disability, sought, in essence, a declaration that he was entitled to termination pay and pay for unused sick time pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the respondents County of Nassau and the Nassau County Patrolmen's Benevolent Association.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the following provision of the governing collective bargaining agreement is clear and unambiguous on its face:

"8.12-1 Termination Pay and Pay for Unused Sick Leave.

"Upon separation from service after ten (10) years, for any reason except for cause or with charges pending or upon the death in service of any employee or upon retirement qualifying for either ordinary or job related or accidental disability under the Retirement and Social Security Law of New York State, such employee or his/her legal representative,...