Hill v. State, 61890
Decision Date | 10 September 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 61890,61890 |
Parties | HILL v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Floyd W. Keeble, Jr., Royston, for appellant.
J. Cleve Miller, Dist. Atty., for appellee.
J. I. Hill appeals his conviction of statutory rape of his nine-year-old daughter.
1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict of acquittal because the victim's testimony was not corroborated. The evidence showed that the victim's initial outcry was made to her aunt on Christmas Eve, 1978. According to the victim, she was scared to go home because appellant, her father, made her take off her clothes and go to bed with him. He had had sexual intercourse with her "about 20 times," the most recent of which had occurred approximately one week before her initial outcry. On these occasions the victim's mother would sleep on the couch while the victim slept with her father. Her father told her not to cry out during these episodes or he would whip her. Although the victim's mother testified that she never saw anything out of the ordinary between her husband and daughter, she confirmed that the victim had slept with appellant on several occasions while she had slept on the couch and elsewhere in the home.
We begin with the proposition that no conviction can be had for statutory rape based solely on the uncorroborated testimony of the victim. Code Ann. § 26-2018. Although corroboration is usually had by testimony other than the victim's which fairly tends to prove that the crime was committed and which connects the accused therewith, " 'corroborating identification evidence is not necessary' in statutory rape prosecutions." Chambers v. State, 141 Ga.App. 438, 439, 233 S.E.2d 818 (1977), revd on other grounds, State v. Chambers, 240 Ga. 76, 239 S.E.2d 324 (1977). Moreover, Burnett v. State, 236 Ga. 597, 598, 225 S.E.2d 28 (1976).
" 'It is only when the evidence demands a verdict of not guilty that it is error for the trial court to refuse a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.' " Barnes v. State, 245 Ga. 609, 610, 266 S.E.2d 212 (1980). The victim's testimony in this case was sufficiently corroborated and the evidence did not demand a verdict of acquittal.
2. Appellant also cites as error the trial court's failure to charge the provisions of Code Ann. § 38-1806, that the testimony of a witness who swears wilfully and knowingly falsely is to be disregarded unless corroborated by circumstances or by other unimpeached evidence. In order to make this provision applicable "it must appear, among other things, that the witness admits, on the trial, that he wilfully and knowingly swore falsely, or the testimony must be such as to render the purpose to falsify manifest." Smith v. State, 74 Ga.App. 777(2), 41 S.E.2d 541 (1947). (Emphasis supplied.) Smaha v. George, 195 Ga. 412, 418, 24 S.E.2d 385 (1943).
The pertinent testimony, that of the nine-year-old victim, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cargill v. State
...such as to render the purpose to falsify manifest.' Smith v. State, 74 Ga.App. 777 (2) (41 S.E.2d 541) (1947)." Hill v. State, 159 Ga.App. 489, 490 (2), 283 S.E.2d 703 (1981). It is debatable whether this statutory provision was even applicable in this case. However, the trial court's instr......
-
Hanvey v. State, 75135
...must be such as to render the purpose to falsify manifest.' Smith v. State, 74 Ga.App. 777(2) (41 SE2d 541) (1947); Hill v. State, 159 Ga.App. 489(2) (283 SE2d 703) (1981)." While defendant contends that the evidence adduced at trial did not authorize the charge at issue, this contention is......
-
Fugitt v. State
...471. Absent a request, the trial court did not err by failing to charge the language of OCGA § 24-9-85 (b). Compare Hill v. State, 159 Ga.App. 489(2), 283 S.E.2d 703 (1981). 7. In his final enumeration of error, Fugitt argues that the trial court should have granted his plea in bar on the g......
-
Worth v. State, 74069
...229 S.E.2d 520 (1976) [child molestation]; Roberts v. State, 158 Ga.App. 309(2) 279 S.E.2d 753 (1981) [sodomy]; Hill v. State, 159 Ga.App. 489, 490(2), 283 S.E.2d 703 (1981) [statutory rape; testimony as to victim's past sexual encounters irrelevant]; Estes v. State, 165 Ga.App. 453(1), 301......