Hilowitz v. Hilowitz

Decision Date14 December 1981
Citation85 A.D.2d 621,444 N.Y.S.2d 948
PartiesMinnie HILOWITZ, Appellant, v. Kenneth HILOWITZ, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Wolfe, Yukelson & Adler, New York City (Bruce Yukelson, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Diamond, Rutman & Costello, New York City (Siff & Newman, P. C., Louis G. Adolfsen and L. Kevin Sheridan, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Before RABIN, J. P., and MARGETT, O'CONNOR and THOMPSON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 22, 1980, 105 Misc.2d 384, 432 N.Y.S.2d 344, which denied her motion to dismiss the defense of collateral estoppel.

Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff's contention that only a judicially confirmed arbitration award may form the basis for the defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel is without merit. Judicial confirmation may be the recommended practice (see CPLR 7510; Siegel, New York Practice, § 601, p. 860), but the doctrines are applicable to issues resolved by arbitration where there has been a final determination on the merits (see Kilduff v. Donna Oil Corp., 74 A.D.2d 562, 424 N.Y.S.2d 282), notwithstanding a lack of confirmation of the award (cf. Hana Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Sheet Metal Workers Int. Assn., 378 F.Supp. 1001).

We have examined plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them also to be without merit.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Buckner v. Kennard
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • September 17, 2004
    ......Apple, 102 A.D.2d 236, 477 N.Y.S.2d 774 (1984), aff'd, 65 N.Y.2d 746, 492 N.Y.S.2d 20, 481 N.E.2d 560 (1985) ; Hilowitz v. Hilowitz, 85 A.D.2d 621, 444 N.Y.S.2d 948 (1981) ; Cities Serv. Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 1999 OK 14, 980 P.2d 116 ; Dunlap v. Wild, 22 ......
  • Hursh v. DST Sys.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • March 31, 2023
    ...there has been a final determination on the merits, notwithstanding a lack of confirmation of the award.” (citing Hilowitz v. Hilowitz, 85 A.D.2d 621, 444 N.Y.S.2d 948, 949 (N.Y.App.Div. 1981)). DST has not provided, and the Court is not aware of, any authority to suggest that class certifi......
  • White v. State, 87018
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • July 1, 1994
    ...... (County of Rockland v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 129 A.D.2d 606, 514 N.Y.S.2d 102; Hilowitz v. Hilowitz, 85 A.D.2d 621, 444 N.Y.S.2d 948 [arbitrator's award on merits entitled to res judicata effect despite lack of confirmation].). ......
  • Jacobson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 9, 1997
    .......         Hilowitz v. Hilowitz, 85 A.D.2d 621, 444 N.Y.S.2d 948, 949 (2d Dep't 1981) (internal citations omitted). The Second Department has consistently reaffirmed ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT