Hobbs v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 89CA1722
Decision Date | 28 June 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89CA1722,89CA1722 |
Citation | 804 P.2d 210 |
Parties | Willie HOBBS, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE OF COLORADO, and Rockwell International, and Travelers Insurance Company, Respondents. . III |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Brauer, Buescher, Valentine, Goldhammer & Kelman, P.C., Joseph M. Goldhammer, Ellen M. Kelman, Denver, for petitioner.
The Law Firm of Thomas J. de Marino, Thomas J. de Marino, Ann Holewinski, Denver, for respondents Rockwell Intern. and Travelers Ins. Co.
Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Carolyn A. Boyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent Indus. Claim Appeals Office.
Opinion by Judge NEY.
Claimant, Willie Hobbs, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which affirmed an order of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarding claimant permanent partial disability benefits of 10.9 percent as a working unit. We set aside the order and remand.
Claimant brought a claim under the workmen's compensation statutes seeking compensation for permanent disability resulting from work-related, beryllium-caused injury to his lungs. The ALJ found that claimant's berylliosis has rendered him "at least 50% physically impaired." He further found as follows:
The ALJ ultimately determined, however, that Applying Colo.Sess.Laws 1975, ch. 71, § 8-51-108(1)(b) at 303, the ALJ awarded defendant benefits totalling $12,616.97 to be paid at the weekly rate of $84.
On review, claimant contends that the Panel erred in affirming the ALJ's order. He argues the award was in error because it was based soley upon the diminution of his future earnings with his present employer, it reflected no consideration of his diminished future employability in the open labor market, and it ignored the ALJ's findings of extensive physical disability. We agree.
As used in the Workmen's Compensation Act (Act), "disability" means loss of earning capacity. Vail Associates, Inc. v. West, 661 P.2d 1187 (Colo.App.1982), aff'd, 692 P.2d 1111 (Colo.1984). The term "loss of earning capacity," as contemplated by § 8-51-108(1)(b), means the loss of the ability to earn, not simply lost wages. See State Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 786 P.2d 423 (Colo.App.1989).
A worker's actual earnings following an industrial accident or occupational disease are relevant but not presumptive evidence of the worker's earning capacity. Vail Associates, Inc. v. West, 692 P.2d 1111 (Colo.1984). Nor is a claimant's loss of earnings due to injury or occupational disease dispositive of the amount of his entitlement to permanent partial disability benefits. State Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, supra. Instead, such matters are merely individual factors to be considered in determining the existence of impaired earning capacity.
Colo.Sess.Laws 1975, ch. 71, § 8-51-108(1)(b) at 303, the statute applicable here, enumerates several factors to be considered in determining permanent partial disability. Implicit in that enumeration is the concept that the future employability of a claimant is a component of his earning capacity. Vail Associates, Inc. v. West, supra. Indeed, a permanent disability award may take into account the probability of future earnings impairment caused by an injury even if no actual earnings reduction can be shown at the time of the award, and the failure of a claimant to raise evidence of such a possibility may not be grounds for reopening a workmen's compensation case. See Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co., 732 P.2d 642 (Colo.1987).
We conclude that the determination of a claimant's impaired earning capacity under § 8-51-108 and the relevant case law must be based upon his employability in the open labor market, see 2 A. Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law, § 57.21(d) (1989), and not merely ascertained in the limited context of his future employability with his present employer. See ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weld County School Dist. RE-12 v. Bymer, RE-12 and C
... ... Deborah Louise BYMER and Industrial Claim Appeals Office, ... Respondents ... Baird, Assistant Attorney General, State Services Section, Denver, for Amici Curiae the ... Bymer, No. 96CA0041 (Colo.App. Oct. 31, 1996) (not selected for ... Hobbs v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 804 P.2d 210, ... ...
-
McKinney v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo.
... ... 430, 434, 105 P.2d 1087, 1089 (1940); see also Prestige Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. Mitchusson, 825 P.2d 1049 (Colo.App.1991); Hobbs v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 804 P.2d 210 (Colo.App.1990) ... The amendments repealed the presumption of PTD under former § ... ...
-
People v. Weare
...155 P.3d 527 ... The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Darnell ... No. 04CA0333 ... Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II ... October 19, 2006 ... [155 P.3d ... People v. Frye, 898 P.2d 559 (Colo.1995); People v. Candelaria, 107 P.3d 1080 ... Even assuming this claim involves a potentially enforceable "governmental ... ...
-
People v. Stone
... 471 P.3d 1159 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Cole NE, Defendant-Appellant. Court of Appeals No. 16CA1348 Colorado Court of Appeals, Division ... McCann , 122 P.3d 1085, 1087 (Colo. App. 2005) (quoting 18-1.3-601(2), C.R.S. 2004 ... First, the board paid a claim to the trooper's brother for his travel expenses ... Indus. Claim Appeals Office , 2016 CO 25, 38, 370 P.3d 157 (noting that the ... employability with his present employer." Hobbs v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office , 804 P.2d 210, ... ...