Hoffmeister v. McIntosh
| Decision Date | 13 September 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 2941,2941 |
| Parties | Richard L. HOFFMEISTER, Appellant (Plaintiff-Appellant below), v. John McINTOSH, Appellee (Defendant-Appellee below). |
| Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
R. Lauren Moran, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Spence, Hill, Oeland & Tschirgi, Riverton, for appellee.
Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER, HARNSBERGER, and McINTYRE, JJ.
Appellee has presented a petition for rehearing in which he emphasizes that this court has overlooked the appellant's delay in filing a transcript of the county commissioners' proceedings. Since any objection on that ground was waived at the pretrial hearing, the timeliness of the filing was not discussed in the original opinion and does not merit consideration here.
Appellee requests that the court give specific direction regarding the further procedures int he instant case, especially as to what may be considered by the district court on appeal. There is no occasion to enter into a discussion of this subject which has been considered many times both as to appeals from agencies whose authority is constitutional 1 and from those whose authority resides solely in statute. 2 The controlling statute in the instant case provides for an appeal, and that provision should not be enlarged. This means, of course, that the trial in the district court will be a review of the record and not a trial de novo. However, in that connection it should be remembered that such administrative tribunals are obligated in their disposition of cases to consider all relevant evidence and argument, 3 and in an appeal from an inferior tribunal, the minutes, if incomplete, are subject to supplementation by competent evidence which would show actual occurrences before the agency. 4
Rehearing denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. United States
...340 U.S. 810, 71 S.Ct. 37, 95 L.Ed. 595 (1950). 10 See, e.g., In re Topper, 165 N.E.2d 19, 23 (Ohio Ct.App.1959); Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, 364 P.2d 823 (Wyo.1961); School Dist. No. 9 v. District Boundary Bd., 351 P.2d 106, 113-114 (Wyo.1960). 11 See, e.g., Powell v. Brannan, 196 F.2d 871, 8......
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Arguello
... ... In applying the statute such matters are of prime importance. Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, rehearing denied Wyo., 364 P.2d 823 ... Also, no citation of authority is necessary to support ... ...
-
Basin Elec. Power Co-op. v. State Bd. of Control
...Trustees of Washakie County School Dist. No. 1, Wyo., 563 P.2d 1376, 1380; and Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, 679, reh. den.364 P.2d 823. While the legislative declaration of intent and purpose is not binding upon us, it is, nevertheless, worthy of consideration as an aid to c......
-
Voss' Adoption, Matter of
...of construction. This is not a personal or a new view. In the case of Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, 679, rehearing denied, 364 P.2d 823, it was mentioned that the context, position of the sections, and the insertion of subheads, are unmistakable indicia of the intention of th......