Hogan v. Platts, 23849
| Decision Date | 09 December 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 23849,23849 |
| Citation | 430 S.E.2d 510,312 S.C. 1 |
| Parties | Marviette HOGAN and Mike Hogan, Respondents, v. Owen PLATTS, Appellant. In re Jessica PLATTS, a minor under the age of 14 years. . Heard |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Walter Bedingfield, Barnwell, for appellant.
William S. Kemp, of Early, Kemp and Ness, Bamberg, for respondents.
Bruce Perry, Denmark, guardian ad litem for minor.
Appellant Owen Platts appeals the order of the Family Court awarding custody of his minor child, Jessica Platts, to Respondents Marviette Hogan and Mike Hogan. We remand.
Appellant was married to Jessica's mother, Mary Alice Platts. Jessica was born October 28, 1988, and seriously injured in an automobile accident on November 5, 1988, in which Mary Alice Platts was killed. When Jessica was released from the hospital on November 11, 1988, the appellant consented for her to be placed in the custody of the respondents where she has remained. The respondents are Jessica's maternal aunt and uncle-in-law, respectively, and also have custody of Jessica's sister, Angela Murray, who is Mary Alice Platts' teen-age daughter from a previous marriage.
On February 17, 1989, respondents instituted this action seeking custody of Jessica. Appellant answered by general denial and counterclaimed for custody. A hearing was held on June 26, 1990, and concluded on August 20, 1990. The evidence adduced indicated that appellant and Mary Alice Platts had a troubled marital relationship with several periods of separation. There was testimony of a history of physical abuse on the part of the appellant toward his wife and mental abuse of Angela, his stepdaughter. The parties were living apart when Jessica was born and still separated at the time of the accident. The appellant testified that he was not aware of Jessica's birth until he was informed of the accident. On June 20, 1989, the Family Court had ordered that the appellant be granted weekly visitation rights with Jessica in the home of the respondents. The appellant testified at the final hearing that he had never exercised the visitation rights because he did not have the time.
By order dated December 31, 1990, the Family Court, inter alia, awarded custody of Jessica to the respondents with visitation privileges to the appellant. Based upon evidence presented at the hearing, the recommendation of the guardian ad litem and the results of home studies performed by the Department of Social Services of Hampton and Bamberg Counties, the court found that respondents were "fit and proper persons, and that it is clearly in the best interest of the minor child" for custody to remain with the respondents.
On appeal, the appellant argues that the family court judge failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Moore v. Moore, 300 S.C. 75, 386 S.E.2d 456 (1989), and erred in awarding custody to the respondents in the absence of a finding that the appellant was unfit.
There is a rebuttable presumption that the right to custody of their minor child automatically reverts to the surviving parent when the custodial parent dies. Oehler v. Clinton, 282 S.C. 25, 317 S.E.2d 445 (1984). In Kay v. Rowland, 285 S.C. 516, 331 S.E.2d 781 (1985), this Court recognized that natural parents have superior...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tracie F. v. Francisco D.
...prove his or her fitness, custody is maintained or awarded based strictly upon the best interest of the child. See also Hogan v. Platts, 312 S.C. 1, 430 S.E.2d 510 (1993) ; Malpass v. Hodson, 309 S.C. 397, 424 S.E.2d 470 (1992).South Carolina, however, also statutorily recognizes the psycho......
-
Dodge v. Dodge
...Furthermore, the supreme court has permitted a third party to maintain a custody action against a natural parent. Hogan v. Platts, 312 S.C. 1, 430 S.E.2d 510 (1993). In Hogan, the child's maternal aunt and uncle sued the father for custody after the father consented to the aunt and uncle ke......
-
Alukonis v. Smith
...relinquishment of custody occurred; and4) The degree of attachment between the child and the temporary custodian. Hogan v. Platts , 312 S.C. 1, 3-4, 430 S.E.2d 510, 511 (1993) (citing Moore , 300 S.C. at 79-80, 386 S.E.2d at 458 ). "The rebuttable presumption standard requires a case by cas......
-
Barber v. Smith, 2010-UP-157
...court failed to rule on whether a parent was fit to have custody. See, e.g., Gandy, 297 S.C. at 414, 377 S.E.2d at 314; Hogan, 312 S.C. at 4, 430 S.E.2d at 511. the family court awarded Eison custody and Barber unsupervised visitation but made no finding Barber was unfit to have custody of ......