Holloman v. State

Decision Date02 June 1988
Docket NumberNo. 71296,71296
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 368 Carvel HOLLOMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Direct Conflict of Decisions; Fourth District--Case No. 4-86-2583.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Diane E. Leeds and Celia A. Terenzio, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Holloman v. State, 511 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which expressly and directly conflicts with Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987), and Morganti v. State, 524 So.2d 641 (Fla.1988), quashing 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinions in Shull and Morganti.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Haram v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1994

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT