Holmin v. TRW, INC.
| Decision Date | 09 May 2001 |
| Citation | 167 N.J. 205,770 A.2d 283 |
| Parties | Ralph W. HOLMIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRW, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Carmine COPPOLA, Ruth E. Miller, Arthur B. Branstine and Synnex Information Technologies, Inc., Defendants. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Scott J. Wenner, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for appellant (Littler Mendelson, attorneys; Mr. Wenner, New York City, Stefanie W. Kohen and William P. McLane, Morristown, on the briefs). David J. Gruber, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Lehman, Lehman & Gruber, attorneys).
Jon W. Green, Springfield, argued the cause for amicus curiae, National Employment Lawyers Association of New Jersey (Deutsch Resnick Green & Gramigna, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lesemann's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 330 N.J.Super. 30, 748 A.2d 1141 (2000).
For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI—7.
Opposed—none.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Arcand v. Brother Intern. Corp.
...is essential to a claim of fraud or deceit. Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 330 N.J.Super. 30, 36, 748 A.2d 1141 (App.Div.2000), aff'd, 167 N.J. 205, 770 A.2d 283 (N.J.2001). The facts as they are alleged do not permit the Court to find that Plaintiffs suffered even a modicum of damages as a result of......
-
Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford
...of such legislation. An illustrative decision is Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 330 N.J.Super. 30, 748 A.2d 1141 (App.Div.2000), aff'd, 167 N.J. 205, 770 A.2d 283 (2001). As is the case here, the defendant in Holmin claimed that the Ricks-Chardon rule was well established law. Id., at 37, 748 A.2d 11......
-
In re Casini, Bankruptcy No. 97-39420 RTL.
...30, 36, 748 A.2d 1141 (App.Div.2000); citing Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors, 148 N.J. 582, 691 A.2d 350 (1997), aff'd, 167 N.J. 205, 770 A.2d 283 (2001); Karo Marketing Corp. v. Playdrome America, 331 N.J.Super. 430, 752 A.2d 341 (N.J.App.Div.2000) cert. denied, 165 N.J. 603, 762 A.2d 217......
-
County of Hudson v. Janiszewski
...cause of action first arises. Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 330 N.J.Super. 30, 35, 748 A.2d 1141 (App.Div.2000), aff'd without opinion, 167 N.J. 205, 770 A.2d 283 (2001). As found above, the Court has determined that Plaintiffs knew of Janiszewski's involvement in a federal investigation into a brib......