Hooten v. State
| Decision Date | 28 May 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 43249,43249 |
| Parties | HOOTEN v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., and Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for the State.
J. Douglas Willix, Atlanta, for Charles Roy Hooten, III.
The appellant, Charles Hooten, was convicted of the murder of his wife, Dorothea La Via, and received a life sentence. 1 He appeals, and we affirm.
On December 25, 1984, Deneal Kuhar visited the home of her mother, Dorothea La Via, and her stepfather, the appellant, to have Christmas dinner. During the meal an argument occurred between Hooten and La Via concerning her relationship with her ex-husband and her drinking problem. Kuhar left her mother's house at about 5:15 p.m., and returned to her own home.
Mr. Hooten testified that at about 6:00 p.m. La Via informed him she was going back to her ex-husband. He added that he gave her $50 and told her to go, and that she left, taking the money and her car. Shortly after six o'clock that evening La Via arrived at the residence of Jack Henley, which was about five or six blocks from her home. Henley rented a room in a house owned by Clarence Kitchens. Several other persons also lived there, including Lonnie Kitchens, Clarence's son, and Anthony Walsh, Clarence's nephew. La Via had lived with Henley in June and July of 1984 during a period of separation from Hooten. When La Via arrived she told Henley her husband had kicked her out of her house and asked if she could stay with him. Henley asked Kitchens if La Via could stay, and Kitchens said that she could. Henley told La Via he was expecting his girlfriend, Ellen Barfield, and that they would be going out. At about 6:30 Barfield arrived, and Henley left with her. At 11:00 to 11:15 p.m. Henley and Barfield returned to Henley's residence to get medication to relieve chest pains Henley was experiencing. When Henley entered the house La Via was on the couch and Walsh was on a loveseat. La Via asked Henley if he wanted her to take him to the hospital. He declined her offer, explaining that Barfield was waiting for him in the car. Mr. Henley got his medicine and left. According to Walsh, La Via got up after Henley left, said she was going home, and left.
At 12:50 a.m. on December 26, 1984, Detective Richard Adams of the Hapeville Police Department saw a yellow cab parked in the parking lot of a local elementary school. The detective, who was in plainclothes and was driving an unmarked car, drove around the block and stopped his car in back of the cab. Subsequently, he observed the cab exit the parking lot with its headlights turned off. Detective Adams followed the cab, whose driver turned on its headlights only after traveling approximately three blocks from the parking lot. At that time Detective Adams called in the tag number of the cab and asked that the cab be stopped by a uniformed policeman in a marked police car. Detective Adams followed the cab until it was stopped by Sergeant Summerville of the Hapeville Police Department. The driver of the cab was Hooten, who told the officers that he was looking for his wife. He further told them that he thought her ex-boyfriend lived behind the school, and that he thought that was where she had gone. Following their conversation with Hooten, the officers allowed him to go home.
At 9:00 a.m. on December 26, 1984, the body of La Via was found in a grassy area about 13 feet from where Hooten's cab had been parked when it was first observed by Detective Adams. The cause of La Via's death was determined to be strangulation, and the autopsy also revealed a number of abrasions, lacerations, and bruises. La Via was not wearing shoes, and none were found at the scene.
The Hapeville Police located Hooten and informed him of his wife's death, and asked for permission to search his house, which he gave. During the search a pair of gray boots were found in a bedroom closet and a gold necklace was found in the bathroom. Officers also found broken glass on the living room floor, on a coffee table, and in a trash can, as well as a refrigerator handle which was lying on the kitchen counter wrapped in a towel. Both Henley and Lonnie Kitchens testified that La Via was wearing the gray boots the last time they saw her. In addition, Kuhar testified that when she left her mother's house Christmas evening, the refrigerator handle was attached to the refrigerator, and her mother was wearing the gold necklace.
Hooten testified that he did not see...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Character v. State
...(1982). 8. Slakman, 272 Ga. at 667, 533 S.E.2d 383; Jackson v. State, 256 Ga. 536, 537-538, 350 S.E.2d 428 (1986); Hooten v. State, 256 Ga. 31, 33-34, 343 S.E.2d 481 (1986). 9. Jackson, 256 Ga. at 538, 350 S.E.2d 428. Accord Slakman, 272 Ga. at 667, 533 S.E.2d 10. 255 Ga. 490, 493, 339 S.E.......
-
Slakman v. State
...710 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1221, 103 S.Ct. 1228, 75 L.Ed.2d 462 (1983). 17. 250 Ga. at 213, 296 S.E.2d 710; Hooten v. State, 256 Ga. 31, 33, 343 S.E.2d 481 (1986). 18. Jackson v. State, 256 Ga. 536, 538, 350 S.E.2d 428 (1986). 19. Mallory v. State, 261 Ga. 625(2), 409 S.E.2d 839 (19......
-
Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.
... ... Aetna Life Ins. Co., 126 Ga.App. 140, 190 S.E.2d 110 (1972); Columbia Drug Co. v. Cook, 127 Ga.App. 490, 194 S.E.2d 286 (1972); State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. v ... Tucker, 130 Ga.App. 187, 202 S.E.2d 551 (1973); Applegarth Supply Co. v. Schaffer, 130 Ga.App. 353, 203 S.E.2d 277 ... ...
-
Harris v. State
...were trustworthy, exclusion of the hearsay evidence still would not have constituted reversible error. See Hooten v. State, 256 Ga. 31, 33(1), 343 S.E.2d 481 (1986). 6. Several enumerations of error relate to the jury (a) Appellant requested a charge dealing with the credibility of a State ......