Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp.

Decision Date27 March 2008
Docket Number3205N.
Citation854 N.Y.S.2d 689,2008 NY Slip Op 02771,49 A.D.3d 477
PartiesB.J. HOPPE, Respondent, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE 51-78 OWNERS CORP. et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court improperly granted plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint in this dispute between plaintiff shareholder and defendants cooperative corporation and its board of directors in connection with defendants' denial of plaintiff's proposed alterations to her two units. Although leave to amend a pleading is freely granted (CPLR 3025 [b]), such leave should "not be granted upon mere request, without appropriate substantiation" (Brennan v City of New York, 99 AD2d 445, 446 [1984]). Here, the proposed amended complaint seeks to include a breach of fiduciary duty claim against various past and present members of defendant board, yet ascribes no independent tortious conduct to any individual director (see Messner v 112 E. 83rd St. Tenants Corp., 42 AD3d 356, 357 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 976 [2007]; DeCastro v Bhokari, 201 AD2d 382, 383 [1994]). Insofar as plaintiff alleges that one of the board members endeavored to coerce a settlement of the instant action, a review of the allegations contained in the proposed amended complaint reveals that the misconduct alleged was occasioned by the board acting in its corporate capacity, or by the board member acting within the scope of his corporate duties (see Konrad v 136 E. 64th St. Corp., 246 AD2d 324, 325-326 [1998]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Loch Sheldrake Beach & Tennis Inc. v. Akulich
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 7, 2016
    ...capacity and she does not ascribe independent tortious conduct to any individual director (see Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51–78 Owners Corp., 49 A.D.3d 477, 477, 854 N.Y.S.2d 689 [2008] ; Kravtsov v. Thwaites Terrace House Owners Corp., 267 A.D.2d 154, 155, 700 N.Y.S.2d 177 [1999] ). Ev......
  • Charles v. Suvannavejh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 17, 2009
    ...claims have merit, Fellner v. Morimoto, 52 A.D.3d 352, 353, 862 N.Y.S.2d 349 (1st Dep't 2008); Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp., 49 A.D.3d 477, 854 N.Y.S.2d 689 (1st Dep't 2008); Sabo v. Alan B. Brill, P.C., 25 A.D.3d 420, 421, 808 N.Y.S.2d 194 (1st Dep't 2006); Thompson v.......
  • Jefferson Acquisition Corp. v. 450 Vill. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 27, 2013
    ...agent MSM, which was not a party to the lease, let alone independent tortious conduct. Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp., 49 A.D.3d 477 (1st Dep't 2008); American Theatre for the PerformingPage 7Arts, Inc. v. Consolidated Credit Corp., 45 A.D.3d 506 (1st Dep't 2007); Manhatt......
  • Green v. Verizon N.Y., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 14, 2013
    ...the burden to demonstrate her proposed claims' merit through admissible evidence. Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp., 49 A.D.3d 477 (1st Dep't 2008); Nathanson v. Tri-State Constr. LLC, 48 A.D.3d 373, 374 (1st Dep't 2008); Robinson v. Canniff, 22 A. D.3d 219, 220 (1st Dep't 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT