House v. American Surety Co.

Decision Date17 November 1899
Citation54 S.W. 303
PartiesHOUSE v. AMERICAN SURETY CO.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from district court, Harris county; William H. Wilson, Judge.

Action by Henry House against the American Surety Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

W. P. & A. R. Hamblen, for appellant. Ewing & Ring, for appellee.

GARRETT, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellant, Henry House, against the appellee, the American Surety Company, to recover of it as surety upon the bond of Bonnell, Matthews & Harding, given to the appellant for the faithful performance of their contract with him to erect a three-story brick building agreeably to the attached drawings and specifications. The petition alleged that the contractors had failed to complete or construct the building in accordance with the contract, to appellant's damage in the sum of $6,551.83, and that the principals were not joined as defendants because they were non-residents and notoriously insolvent. The defenses were that (1) the surety was discharged by the subsequent alteration of the contract, whereby the owner and contractors, without the consent of the surety, made a supplemental agreement for the erection of a four-story, instead of a three-story, building: (2) the plaintiff had prematurely, and without warrant under the contract, taken the work out of the hands of the contractors. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for the defendant.

Henry House entered into a written contract on July 11, 1895, with the firm of Bonnell, Matthews & Harding, for the performance by them, under the direction and to the satisfaction of the architects, acting as the agents of the owner, "of the work included in the erection, construction, and completion of one certain three-story brick building, * * * agreeably to the drawings and specifications made by the said architects, * * * including all labor and material incident thereto," for the price of $20,500, payable in specified installments. The contract, among other things, provided: "3rd. Should any alteration be required in the work as shown or described by the drawings or specifications, a fair and reasonable valuation of the work added or omitted shall be made by the architects, and the sum herein agreed to be paid for the work according to the original specifications shall be increased or diminished, as the case may be. * * * 6th. The contractors shall and will proceed with said work, and every part and detail thereof, in a prompt and diligent manner, and shall and will wholly finish the said work according to the said drawings and specifications and this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1918
    ... ... 558 273 Mo. 279 CITY OF KENNETT, Appellant, v. KATZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and AMERICAN" SURETY COMPANY Supreme Court of Missouri, Second Division February 16, 1918 ...         \xC2" ... 287, 50 ... S.W. 508; Consaul v. Sheldon, 35 Neb. 247, 52 N.W ... 1104; House v. Surety Co., 21 Tex. Civ. App. 590, 54 ... S.W. 303.] There is no evidence of such changes ... ...
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1921
    ...or exterior dimensions of the building." In the following cases it was held that the changes released the surety: House v. Surety Co., 21 Tex. Civ. App. 590, 54 S. W. 303 (the change was from a three to a four story building); Miller v. Ice Co., 66 Ark. 287, 50 S. W. 508 (the change was fro......
  • In re Technology for Energy Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • May 12, 1992
    ...Co., 196 Iowa 1185, 194 N.W. 70 (1923); People's Lumber Co. v. Gillard, 136 Cal. 55, 68 P. 576 (1902); House v. American Surety Co., 21 Tex.Civ.App. 590, 54 S.W. 303 (1899); Village of Newark v. James F. Leary Constr. Co., 118 Misc. 622, 194 N.Y.S. 212 (Sup.Ct.Wayne Co. The surety can give ......
  • Bartlett & Kling v. Illinois Surety Co.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1909
    ... ... substantially changed without the written order referred to, ... or even with such order, the surety is released. See ... House v. Am. Surety Co., 21 Tex. Civ. App. 590 (54 ... S.W. 303); Miller v. Ft. Smith Co., 66 Ark. 287 (50 ... S.W. 508); Erfurth v. Stevenson, 71 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT