Houser v. McKennon

Decision Date31 December 1872
CitationHouser v. McKennon, 60 Tenn. 287 (Tenn. 1872)
PartiesJ. F. HOUSER v. J. T. M. McKENNON.
CourtTennessee Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

FROM MAURY.

Appeal from the Circuit Court.WM. P. MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

N. R. WILKES for Houser.

A. C. HICKEY for McKennon.

DEADERICK, Judge, delivered the opinion of the Court.

McKennon obtained a judgment, upon an open account against Houser, for $252.50, upon a warrant in debt under $500, before S. D. Herndon, a Justice of the Peace of Maury County.Houser brought the case into the Circuit Court, where, on leave granted, he amended his petition contesting the jurisdiction of the Justice to render a judgment, and entered a motion to quash the proceedings.

Motion to dismiss the petition and amended petitions were made and overruled.

The Court refused to quash the proceeding, and submitted the cause to a jury, who gave a verdict against Houser for $39.50, and the cause is brought into this Court by writ of error.

The Justice's judgment was absolutely void, and it may well be resisted whenever an attempt is made to enforce it.

The defendant does not lose his right to contest it by failing to appeal; having no validity, because of want of jurisdiction, the defendant may bring it into the Circuit Court to have the proceedings quashed, without giving a reason for having failed to appeal.And it makes no difference that the excess of the judgment, over the sum of which the Justice has...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Baxter Bailey Invs. LLC v. Apl Ltd.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • September 21, 2015
    ...exceed their jurisdictional limits or their subject matter jurisdiction. Harris v. Hadden, 75 Tenn. 214, 216 (1881); Houser v. McKinnon, 60 Tenn. 287, 288 (1872); Morrow v. Calloway, 8 Tenn. (1 Martin & Yer.) 240, 241 (1827).Ware, 898 S.W.2d 181, 183-84 (Tenn. 1995) (footnotes omitted). Fur......
  • Ware v. Meharry Medical College
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • April 24, 1995
    ...exceed their jurisdictional limits or their subject matter jurisdiction. Harris v. Hadden, 75 Tenn. 214, 216 (1881); Houser v. McKinnon, 60 Tenn. 287, 288 (1872); Morrow v. Calloway, 8 Tenn. (1 Martin & Yer.) 240, 241 B. The concern about the quality of justice dispensed by the justice of t......
  • Manning v. Feidelson
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1940
    ...v. Halliday, 106 Tenn. 607, 61 S.W. 1025, 53 L.R.A. 477, 82 Am.St.Rep. 902; Galyon v. Gilmore, 93 Tenn. 671, 28 S.W. 301; Houser v. McKennon, 60 Tenn. 287, 1 Baxt. 287. Objection for want of such jurisdiction can made at any time and is fatal whenever presented. Agee v. Dement, 20 Tenn. 332......
  • Salitan v. Dashney
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1959
    ...Byers, supra; Jones v. Jones, 1832, 14 N.C. 360; Gregg v. Wooden, 1856, 7 Ind. 499; Feillet v. Engler, 1857, 8 Cal. 76, 77; Houser v. McKennon, 1873, 60 Tenn. 287; and Bud Hoard Co. v. F. Berg & Co., 1929, 137 Okl. 16, 278 P. In determining whether the amount claimed in the complaint exceed......