Howe v. City of Lowell
| Decision Date | 31 August 1898 |
| Citation | Howe v. City of Lowell, 171 Mass. 575, 51 N.E. 536 (Mass. 1898) |
| Parties | HOWE v. CITY OF LOWELL. WILSON et al. v. SAME (two cases). GOODALE v. SAME. UNDERWOOD v. SAME (two cases). |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Report from superior court, Middlesex county; J.B. Richardson, Judge.
Separate writs of entry by Edward S. Howe and by five others against the city of Lowell.The superior court ruled in favor of demandant in each case, and reported the cases to the supreme judicial court.Judgment for tenant, except in the Howe case.
The court found on certain matters as follows, viz.:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. Com.
...Norfolk, 114 Mass. 555, 556-557, 561-562 (1874)) in perpetuity (see Wellington, petrs., 16 Pick. 87, 98-101 (1834); Howe v. Lowell, 171 Mass. 575, 581-582, 51 N.E. 536 (1898)). It is settled that "(l)and may be granted upon a trust to maintain a highway or boulevard in perpetuity . . . (and......
-
Nickols v. Commissioners of Middlesex County
...may be subject to an enforceable general public obligation or trust to use the property for those purposes. See Howe v. City of Lowell, 171 Mass. 575, 577, 584, 51 N.E. 536; Codman v. Crocker, 203 Mass. 146, 150, 89 N.E. 177, 178, 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 980 ('where property is dedicated * * * to a......
-
Cohen v. City of Lynn
...By ornamenting the parkway and making the general area pleasing to the eye, the parcel serves park purposes. See Howe v. Lowell, 171 Mass. 575, 580-581, 51 N.E. 536 (1898); Hamlen v. Sorkin, 251 Mass. 143, 150-151, 146 N.E. 265 (1925). In sum, the judge's findings, none of which is clearly ......
-
Callagy v. Town of Aquinnah
...Ct. Sept. 28, 2009). When terms are not defined, courts often use dictionaries to determine their meanings. See Howe v. City of Lowell, 171 Mass. 575, 51 N.E. 536, 541 (1898) (defining “boulevard” in a deed using the Century Dictionary ); see, e.g., Stor/Gard, Inc. v. Strathmore Insurance C......
Get Started for Free