Humana of Florida, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, s. BI-246

Decision Date11 September 1986
Docket NumberBK-418,Nos. BI-246,s. BI-246
Parties11 Fla. L. Weekly 1946 HUMANA OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a Humana Hospital Daytona Beach, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, & Surgicare III, Sponsor of Surgicare Outpatient Care of Daytona Beach, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James C. Hauser, of Messer, Vickers, Caparello, French & Madsen, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Lesley Mendelson, H.R.S., for appellee HRS.

Kevin B. Getzendanner, Charles L. Gregory and Anne S. Infinger, of Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, for appellee Surgicare III.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant, intervenor in a formal hearing to contest issuance of a certificate of need, seeks review of a Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) final order by which the formal hearing was cancelled and the application for the certificate of need was approved.

Appellant contends that, having properly intervened in the administrative proceeding, it could not be divested of its rights as a party by the initial petitioner's voluntary dismissal of the hearing. Appellant bases its argument upon an assertion that section 381.494(8)(e), Florida Statutes, which provides that affected parties have 30 days from notice of a certificate of need decision to contest the action in a formal hearing, is a statute of limitation inuring to the benefit of an intervenor after the limitation period runs when there is community of interest between the original petitioner and the intervenor. We disagree and affirm.

Surgicare III submitted an application for a certificate of need to construct an ambulatory-surgical center in Volusia County, and HRS on April 2, 1984 preliminarily approved the application. Halifax Hospital on May 10, 1984 filed a petition for a section 120.57(1) formal hearing to challenge the action.

Appellant on March 19, 1985 filed a petition to intervene in the same proceeding, alleging it would be substantially affected by approval of the certificate of need. The hearing officer granted appellant intervenor status.

Halifax Hospital on July 30, 1985 filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its petition for formal hearing. The hearing officer entered an order cancelling the hearing and closing the Department of Administrative Hearings file. HRS then entered an order, concluding that Halifax Hospital had an absolute right to dismiss its action, and that exercise of that right terminated the proceeding. HRS asserted that section 381.494(8)(e), Florida Statutes, is jurisdictional, and an intervenor has no right to a hearing unless the original petitioner continues its action.

A party must comply with the requirements of section 381.494(8)(e) in order to be eligible for a section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, hearing.

This court has held that before an agency has "review"...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Department of Professional Regulation, Florida State Bd. of Medicine v. Marrero, 87-1285
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 18, 1988
    ...Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 509 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Humana of Florida, Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 500 So.2d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (1987). These cases, however, are not controlling as applied to the......
  • Simms v. Napolitano
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • August 5, 2003
    ...Resorts, Inc. v. Wiregrass Ranch, Inc., 630 So.2d 1123 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1993) and Humana of Florida., Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 500 So.2d 186 (Fla.Dist. Ct.App.1986) for the proposition that an agency loses jurisdiction once an applicant withdraws an applicat......
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CONFED. OF SOUTHWEST FL., INC. v. IMC Phosphates, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 2003
    ...of the main proceeding." The same principle has been applied in administrative proceedings. See Humana of Fla., Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehab. Servs., 500 So.2d 186, 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). As these authorities illustrate, the rights of an intervenor are much more limited than the righ......
  • Saddlebrook Resorts, Inc. v. Wiregrass Ranch, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 1993
    ...(see also RHPC, Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 509 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA1987; Humana of Florida, Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 500 So.2d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA1986, rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987; Rudloe v. Dep't of Envtl. Regulation, 517 So.2d ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT