Hunt v. Whitt, 21980

Decision Date25 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 21980,21980
Citation279 S.C. 343,306 S.E.2d 621
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesJames A. HUNT, Respondent, v. Eli WHITT, Havatampa Cigar Company and The Insurance Company of North America, Appellants.

Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, Greenville, for appellants.

Law Offices of John Bolt Culbertson, Greenville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is a Worker's Compensation case here on appeal by the employer from an order of the circuit court reversing and remanding the case to the Hearing Commissioner for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony from the claimant. Because the interlocutory order of the circuit court does not involve the merits of the action, it is not reviewable by this Court for lack of finality. King v. The Singer Company, Power Tool Division, 276 S.C. 419, 279 S.E.2d 367 (1981). To the extent that the following cases and any others not cited can be construed to authorize appeals under the present circumstances, those cases are overruled. Couch v. Greenville County, 249 S.C. 186, 153 S.E.2d 394 (1967); Amick v. City of Columbia, 247 S.C. 254, 146 S.E.2d 860 (1966); Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 241 S.C. 116, 127 S.E.2d 288 (1962).

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice. See Gunnells v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 261 S.C. 106, 198 S.E.2d 535 (1973).

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Bone v. U.S. Food Serv.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 26 Junio 2013
    ...an administrative agency is not directly appealable. Owens v. Canal Wood Corp., 281 S.C. 491, 316 S.E.2d 385 (1984); Hunt v. Whitt, 279 S.C. 343, 306 S.E.2d 621 (1983). To the extent our recent decision in Blakely v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 310 S.C. 29, 425 S.E.2d 37 (1993), may b......
  • Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 24 Octubre 2005
    ...an administrative agency is not directly appealable. Owens v. Canal Wood Corp., 281 S.C. 491, 316 S.E.2d 385 (1984); Hunt v. Whitt, 279 S.C. 343, 306 S.E.2d 621 (1983). Montjoy, 316 S.C. 52, 446 S.E.2d The question here is whether the circuit court order is a "final judgment" under section ......
  • Bone v. U.S. Food Serv.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 1 Agosto 2012
    ...“affects the merits,” citing, among other cases, Owens v. Canal Wood Corp., 281 S.C. 491, 316 S.E.2d 385 (1984) and Hunt v. Whitt, 279 S.C. 343, 306 S.E.2d 621 (1983). Employer maintains the current order is appealable because the circuit court decided a portion of the case, compensability,......
  • Long v. Sealed Air Corp..
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 26 Enero 2011
    ...only the propriety of the remand. See Owens v. Canal Wood Corp., 281 S.C. 491, 491–92, 316 S.E.2d 385 (1984); Hunt v. Whitt, 279 S.C. 343, 343–44, 306 S.E.2d 621, 622 (1983). Such an appeal does not involve the merits of the case. On the other hand, a circuit court ruling on the merits has ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT