Husband G. v. Wife G.
Decision Date | 07 October 1977 |
Parties | HUSBAND G., Appellant, v. WIFE G., Appellee. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Delaware |
Upon appeal from Family Court. Prior order vacated.
Melvyn A. Woloshin, of Woloshin, Tenenbaum & Brandt, Wilmington, for appellant.
Joseph H. Flanzer and Richard Galperin, of Flanzer & Isaacs, Wilmington, for appellee.
Before HERRMANN, C. J., and DUFFY and McNEILLY, JJ.
This is a direct appeal from the Family Court which this Court ordered dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, subject to appellant's right to remove the case to the Superior Court under the transfer statute, 10 Del.C. § 1901. * Thereafter, appellant filed a motion for reargument, contending that the action seeks separate maintenance for a wife and that a direct appeal lies in such case. Reargument was ordered and we now find merit in appellant's argument.
The right of appeal provided in § 515 is stated in terms of rights which parties would have had before its enactment, that is, when the Court of Chancery had subject matter jurisdiction over separate maintenance and support actions. The statute reads in part:
Before the enactment of § 515 in 1974, the Chancery Court had jurisdiction over a common law equity claim for separate maintenance or support, DuPont v. DuPont, Del.Super., 32 Del.Ch. 413, 85 A.2d 724, 733 (1951), as well as a claim for the same relief which was based upon a contract. It follows, therefore, that by virtue of § 515 a direct appeal will lie to this Court in such case and that the limitation to "contractual" separate maintenance cases announced in Wife K. v. Husband K., supra, is withdrawn.
It is undisputed that this action is by a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cahill v. State
...right of direct appeal to the Supreme Court only in cases formerly within the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. Husband G. v. Wife G., Del.Supr., 379 A.2d 1111 (1977). Support of illegitimate children was not formerly within the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. M. F. v. F., Del.C......
-
G.S.G. v. P.S.G.
...shall retain exclusive jurisdiction over such latter actions."8 The holding of Wife K. v. Husband K. was expanded by Husband G. v. Wife G., Del.Supr., 379 A.2d 1111 (1977). In dismissing the appeal in Wife K., we stated that the appellate jurisdiction of this Court established by 13 Del.C. ......