Hussey v. Town of Oyster Bay

Decision Date06 July 1965
Citation262 N.Y.S.2d 396,24 A.D.2d 570
PartiesPeter S. HUSSEY, Appellant, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Stephen L. Hoffman, New York City, for appellant.

Attilio E. Braune, Town Atty., Oyster Bay, for respondent; Frank Giorgio, Jr., Oyster Bay, of counsel.

Before BELDOCK, P. J., and UGHETTA, BRENNAN, HOPKINS and BENJAMIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover salary allegedly due, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 25, 1965 upon reargument, which adhered to the court's original decision denying his motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed, without costs.

We agree with Special Term that a triable issue of fact exists as to the status of the plaintiff and his right to the benefits of subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law. We disagree, however, with the denial of the motion on the additional ground that plaintiff is required to bring a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to determine his right to the position as a condition precedent to his obtaining back salary. Plaintiff has not been removed from his position; he has been suspended pending a determination as to whether he has been guilty of misconduct. If he is under the protection of the Civil Service Law (§ 75, subd. 3), he is entitled to be compensated for the period of his suspension in excess of thirty days, assuming: (a) that his conduct did not cause the delay in disposing of the charges (Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A.D.2d 260, 263, 250 N.Y.S.2d 171, 173); and (b) that compensation can be sought in an independent action or proceeding (Matter of Carville v. Board of Educ. of Utica City School Dist., 11 A.D.2d 1092, 206 N.Y.S.2d 868; Matter of Bentley v. Henninger, 10 A.D.2d 900, 901, 200 N.Y.S.2d 117, 118).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Finley v. Giacobbe
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 5, 1996
    ...to Gerber v. New York City Hous. Auth., 42 N.Y.2d 162, 397 N.Y.S.2d 608, 366 N.E.2d 268 (1977), and Hussey v. Town of Oyster Bay, 24 A.D.2d 570, 262 N.Y.S.2d 396 (2d Dep't 1965), among other cases. Gerber and Hussey permitted permanent employees under suspension to maintain actions at law f......
  • Sinicropi v. Bennett
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 21, 1983
    ...Prezio v. De Santis, 38 A.D.2d 772, 328 N.Y.S.2d 32; Matter of Gould v. Looney, 34 A.D.2d 807, 311 N.Y.S.2d 695; Hussey v. Town of Oyster Bay, 24 A.D.2d 570, 262 N.Y.S.2d 396; Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A.D.2d 260, 250 N.Y.S.2d 171, affd. 15 N.Y.2d 627, 255 N.Y.S.2d 672, 203 N.E.2d 923)......
  • Holmberg v. Donohue
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 6, 1965
  • Sabatini v. Kirwan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 18, 1973
    ...in cases involving a wide variety of civil servants (Matter of Gould v. Looney, 34 A.D.2d 807, 311 N.Y.S.2d 695; Hussey v. Town of Oyster Bay, 24 A.D.2d 570, 262 N.Y.S.2d 396; Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A.D.2d 260, 250 N.Y.S.2d 171, affd. 15 N.Y.2d 627, 255 N.Y.S.2d 672, 203 N.E.2d 923)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT