Hutchinson v. State

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; McCORD
CitationHutchinson v. State, 360 So.2d 1160 (Fla. App. 1978)
Decision Date26 July 1978
Docket NumberNo. II-85,II-85
PartiesLavonia Dewitt HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded guilty to burglary and was sentenced under Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1975) to three years incarceration, three years suspended, to be followed by three years probation with the special condition thereof that appellant spend four months in the county jail with credit for sixty-three (63) days jail time previously served. Within the probationary period, an affidavit for violation of probation was filed. The court found that appellant had violated his probation, and consequently sentenced appellant to five years imprisonment with credit for sixty-three (63) days previously served.

Upon the revocation of probation, the court was authorized to impose any sentence which might have been originally imposed. State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976). Accordingly, the sentence of five years imprisonment was proper. See Sections 810.02(3), 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1975). However, the court was required to credit appellant with all time previously served in jail, including that time served as a condition of probation. State v. Jones, supra; DeForest v. State, 356 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1978). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the cause is remanded for proper...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Thompson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 2018
  • Toombs v. State, 80-2238
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1981
    ...term of years up to fifteen with credit for the three years of incarceration already served, State v. Jones, supra; Hutchinson v. State, 360 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), or could have again placed Toombs on probation for a term not to exceed fifteen years, the maximum allowable prison se......
  • People v. Robinson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • August 27, 1980
    ...in general, a defendant is entitled to credit for jail time served as a condition of probation. Fla.Stat.Ann. 948.06, Hutchinson v. State, 360 So.2d 1160 (Fla.App.1978), Evans v. State, 356 So.2d 1355 (Fla.App.1978), Cal. Penal Codes §§ 1203.1-1203.3, People v. Ham, 44 Cal.App.3d 288, 295, ......
  • State v. Segarra
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 4, 1980
    ...18 (Fla.1976); Scott v. State, 326 So.2d 165 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 836, 97 S.Ct. 104, 50 L.Ed.2d 103 (1976); Hutchinson v. State, 360 So.2d 1160 (Fla.1st DCA 1978).3 This principle is implicit within section 948.06(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which limits resentencing upon revocat......
  • Get Started for Free