E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 94-00500
| Decision Date | 21 April 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-00500,94-00500 |
| Citation | 654 So.2d 226 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D997 E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Appellant, v. Billy W. LAMBERT; Amelia P. Lambert; Conrad Lifsey and Mary Ann Lifsey, partners, doing business as Sunshine Foliage World, a Florida general partnership; the Lakeland Publishing Corporation; Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs; Asgrow Florida Company; and Helena Chemical Company, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Arthur J. England, Jr., Charles M. Auslander and Christopher L. Kurzner of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., Miami; and John A. Boudet of Cabaniss, Burke & Wagner, P.A., Orlando, for DuPont.
Gregg D. Thomas, Steven L. Brannock and Elizabeth Belsom Johnson of Holland & Knight, Tampa; and George Freeman of the New York Times Co., New York City, for the Lakeland Ledger Pub. Corp.
Harry Lewis Michaels, Tallahassee, for Florida Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services.
Shelley Davis of the Farmworker Justice Fund, Inc., Washington, DC; Carl M. Webster of the Rural Law Center, Inc., Apopka; and Robert A. Williams of the Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Tallahassee, for amicus curiae the Florida Farmworker Ass'n and the Nat. Coalition Against Misuse of Pesticides.
Sharon Lee Stedman of Sharon Lee Stedman, P.A., Orlando, for amicus curiae the Florida Defense Lawyers Ass'n.
Loren E. Levy of Law Offices of Larry E. Levy, Tallahassee, for amicus curiae the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for amicus curiae the State of Fla.
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Company (DuPont) appeals an order setting aside a confidentiality order. Because the trial court did not afford DuPont procedural due process, we reverse.
Billy Lambert and others (the appellees) brought suit against DuPont and others alleging that ornamental plants grown for commercial sale were harmed by Benlate TM 50 DF (Benlate). The suit against DuPont was based upon negligence and strict liability.
The appellees' claims were confined strictly to loss of profits to their commercial enterprise. During the course of pretrial discovery, the parties introduced no evidence regarding possible health effects of Benlate, nor any evidence suggesting Benlate had caused or would cause personal injury.
Because of the complexity of the litigation, DuPont made documents available to the plaintiffs which contained confidential, proprietary and trade secret information. This information was made available after the court issued a confidentiality order.
The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department) and the Lakeland Publishing Corporation, doing business as the Lakeland Ledger (Ledger), filed motions pursuant to the Sunshine in Litigation Act (Sunshine Act), section 69.081, Florida Statutes (1991), to set aside the confidentiality order. Based upon allegations that Benlate was a public hazard pursuant to section 69.081, the motions sought to have the confidential information made available to the public. DuPont responded by describing the confidential, proprietary, and trade secret significance of the protected documents.
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
T.L. v. F.M.
...(quoting Arena Parking, Inc. v. Lon Worth Crow Ins. Agency, 768 So.2d 1107, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ) ); E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So.2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ("Due process mandates that in any judicial proceeding, the litigants must be afforded the basic elements o......
-
Green Emerald Homes, LLC v. 21st Mortg. Corp.
...the Best, Inc. v. CitiFinancial Equity Servs., Inc., 14 So. 3d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (quoting E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So. 2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ). The right to be heard "includes more than simply being allowed to be present and to speak"; it includes th......
-
Tanis v. HSBC Bank United States, N.A.
...proceeding, the litigants must be afforded the basic elements of notice and opportunity to be heard." E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So. 2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citing Cty. of Pasco v. Riehl, 635 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1994) ; Cavalier v. Ignas, 290 So. 2d 20 (Fla.1974) ); se......
-
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Dzidzovic
...proceeding, the litigants must be afforded the basic elements of notice and opportunity to be heard." E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So.2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ; see also Arcila v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 145 So.3d 897, 898–99 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (reversing trial......
-
Chapter 14-3 Rule 1.540 and Motions to Vacate Judgment
...testimony prior to ruling.").[140] County of Pasco v. Riehl, 635 So. 2d 17, 18 (Fla.1994); E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So. 2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Edelman v. Breed, 836 So. 2d 1092, 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).[141] Baron v. Baron, 941 So. 2d 1233, 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 20......
-
Chapter 14-3 Rule 1.540 and Motions to Vacate Judgment
...testimony prior to ruling.").[180] County of Pasco v. Riehl, 635 So. 2d 17, 18 (Fla.1994); E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Lambert, 654 So. 2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Edelman v. Breed, 836 So. 2d 1092, 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).[181] Baron v. Baron, 941 So. 2d 1233, 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 20......