In re Bianca G.

• Decision Date: 13 December 2017
• Docket Number: B–823–15,Docket Nos. B–822–15,2015–10054
• Parties: In the MATTER OF BIANCA G. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner–respondent; Tyra R.–W. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

156 A.D.3d 696

64 N.Y.S.3d 911 (Mem)

In the MATTER OF BIANCA G. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner–respondent; Tyra R.–W. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.

2015–10054

Docket Nos. B–822–15

B–823–15

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted – October 17, 2017

December 13, 2017

Gloria Marchetti–Bruck, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (James Castro–Blanco and Eileen Campbell O'Brien of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Darren DeUrso, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Rachel Hahn, J.), dated October 5, 2015. The order of fact-finding and disposition, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner, Westchester County Department of Social Services, for the purpose of adoption.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, Westchester County Department of Social Services, filed a petition pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of abandonment. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the mother abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals.

The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother abandoned the child by failing to visit, or maintain contact with the child or the petitioner, for a six-month period preceding the filing of the petition to terminate her parental rights (see Social Services Law § 384–b ; Matter of Amaru M. [Kizwana M.], 87 A.D.3d 1069, 1069, 929 N.Y.S.2d 764 ; Matter of Robert A.G., 62 A.D.3d 701, 701, 879 N.Y.S.2d 496 ; see also Matter of Samantha L.S. [Daniel S.], 134 A.D.3d 1128, 1129, 23 N.Y.S.3d 287 ). Contrary to the mother's contention, she failed to show that the petitioner prevented or discouraged her from communicating with the child or the agency (see Matter of Amaru M. [Kizwana M.], 87 A.D.3d at 1070, 929 N.Y.S.2d 764 ).

To the extent that the mother contends that her parental rights were improperly terminated because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that it engaged in diligent efforts to encourage her relationship with the child and to provide services to effect the same, that argument lacks merit. In the context of a proceeding to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, a showing of diligent efforts by an authorized agency to encourage the parent to visit and communicate with the child or agency is not required (see Social Services Law § 384–b[5][b] ; Matter of Gabrielle...