In re Bixby
Decision Date | 14 October 1948 |
Docket Number | 3192. |
Parties | In re BIXBY. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Proceedings for the disbarment of Frank W. Bixby, an attorney at law.
Respondent ordered disbarred.
Chapter 126, Laws of 1921, p. 414, § 14, now codified as Rem.Rev.Stat. § 139-14, provides, in part, as follows * * *'
In section 8 of chapter 94, Laws of 1933, creating the Washington State Bar, the board of governors thereof was given the power '* * * to investigate prosecute and hear all causes involving discipline disbarment, suspension or reinstatement, and make recommendations thereon to the supreme court; * * *.'
On May 20, 1948, the board of governors of the state bar association, by its attorney, filed in this court the following motion:
On the same date, the board of governors filed, in support of the above motion, their report and recommendation, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Krogh, In re
...fraudulent income tax returns); In re Dillard, 48 Wash.2d 376, 293 P.2d 761 (1956) (misappropriation of funds), and In re Bixby, 31 Wash.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948) (subornation of perjury--we remarked in that case that we knew of no case in which the court had refused to disbar an attorney......
-
McGrath, Matter of
... ... , 48 Wash.2d 376, 293 P.2d 761 (1956) (misappropriation of funds); In re King, 42 Wash.2d 617, 257 P.2d 219 (1953) (embezzlement); In re Evers, 41 Wash.2d 942, 247 P.2d 890 (1952) (grand larceny); In re Durham, 41 Wash.2d 609, 251 P.2d 169 (1952) (running house of prostitution); In re Bixby, 31 Wash.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948) (subornation of perjury); In re Kennedy, 21 Wash.2d 921, 151 P.2d 614 (1944) (forgery); In re Liliopoulos, 175 Wash. 338, 27 P.2d 691 (1933) (grand larceny); In re Finch, 156 Wash. 609, 287 P. 677 (1930) (illegal sale of liquor); In re Sellers, 142 Wash ... ...
-
Stroh, Matter of
...moral turpitude. In re Kerr, 86 Wash.2d 655, 548 P.2d 297 (1976); In re Caffrey, 71 Wash.2d 554, 429 P.2d 880 (1967); In re Bixby, 31 Wash.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948). Finally, Mr. Stroh requested and the jury was instructed that the crime of which Stroh was charged required proof of crimin......
- Black v. Porter, 30627.
-
§12.3 RPC 8.4: Misconduct
...932, 757 P.2d 519 (1988); In re Stroh, 97 Wn.2d 289, 644 P.2d 1161 (1982). 120.In re Kerr, 86 Wn.2d 655, 548 P.2d 297 (1976); In re Bixby, 31 Wn.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948). 121.In re Wells, 121 Wash. 68, 208 P. 25 (1922). 122.In re Krogh, 85 Wn.2d 462, 536 P.2d 578 (1975). The precise char......
-
§8.2 RPC Pertaining to Advocacy
..., 459 U.S. 1202 (1983); In re Kerr, 86 Wn.2d 655, 548 P.2d 297 (1976); In re Caffrey, 71 Wn.2d 554, 429 P.2d 880 (1967); In re Bixby, 31 Wn.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948) (all involving disbarment for witness tampering, most under DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving moral 88. In re Kronenberg, 1......
-
Table of Cases
...193, 876 P.2d 448 (1994): 8–59 n.466 Bishop v. Jefferson Title Co., 107 Wn. App. 833, 844, 28 P.3d 802 (2001): 2–8 n.39; 2–9 Bixby, In re, 31 Wn.2d 620, 198 P.2d 672 (1948): 8–12 n.87; 12–21 n.120; 12–34 n.211; 16–53; 16–60 Blair v. Wash. State Univ., 108 Wn.2d 558, 740 P.2d 1379 (1987): 7–......