In re C.B., No. A11A1626.

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
Writing for the CourtADAMS
Citation12 FCDR 454,313 Ga.App. 778,723 S.E.2d 21
Docket NumberNo. A11A1626.
Decision Date30 January 2012
PartiesIn the Interest of C.B., a child.

12 FCDR 454
313 Ga.App.
778
723 S.E.2d 21

In the Interest of C.B., a child.

No. A11A1626.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Jan. 30, 2012.


[723 S.E.2d 21]

Kimberly Ann Gross, Jonesboro, Walker L. Chandler, Zebulon, for appellant.

Scott L. Ballard, Dist. Atty., Christy Robert Jindra, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

ADAMS, Judge.

[313 Ga.App. 778] An arrest warrant was issued on July 29, 2009, against then 15–year–old C.B.1 on charges of aggravated sexual battery, aggravated child molestation, aggravated assault, cruelty to children in the first degree and false imprisonment, and it appears undisputed that C.B. has been detained since that date. Because the offenses C.B. was alleged to have committed included aggravated child molestation and aggravated sexual battery, the superior court was vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the case pursuant to OCGA § 15–11–28(b)(2)(A)(v), (vi), and an indictment was returned against [313 Ga.App. 779] C.B. charging her with these and other offenses on February 1, 2010.

Because she was not indicted within 180 days of her detention as required by OCGA § 17–7–50.1, the superior court entered an order granting C.B.'s motion to transfer the case to the juvenile court. However, shortly after the case was transferred to the juvenile court, the State filed a motion to transfer the

[723 S.E.2d 22]

case back to the superior court pursuant to the provisions of OCGA § 15–11–30.2. Following a hearing, the juvenile court granted the motion, and C.B. filed the present appeal from that order.2 Because we find that the juvenile court erred by transferring the case back to the superior court under the circumstances here, we reverse.

As the superior court properly found, it was required to transfer the case to the juvenile court pursuant to the mandatory provisions of OCGA § 17–7–50.1, which provide in relevant part as follows:

(a) Any child who is charged with a crime that is within the jurisdiction of the superior court, as provided in Code Section 15–11–28 or 15–11–30.2, who is detained shall within 180 days of the date of detention be entitled to have the charge against him or her presented to the grand jury....

Further, subsection (b) of that Code section provides that:

(b) If the grand jury does not return a true bill against the detained child within the time limitations set forth in subsection (a) of this Code section, the detained child's case shall be transferred to the juvenile court and shall proceed thereafter as provided in Chapter 11 of Title 15.

In this case, the State failed to procure an indictment against C.B. within 180 days of the date she was detained. Thus, pursuant to the mandatory language of that section as well as recent precedent of this Court, the superior court lost jurisdiction of the case and was required to transfer the case to the appropriate juvenile court. Hill v. State, 309 Ga.App. 531, 710 S.E.2d 667 (2011); see also Nunnally v. State, 311 Ga.App. 558, 559(1), 716 S.E.2d 608 (2011). And, in any event, the transfer from the superior to the juvenile court has not been challenged. Rather, the question here is whether the transfer back to the superior court pursuant to OCGA § 15–11–30.2 was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • State v. Baxter, S16G0184
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • November 21, 2016
    ...deemed invalid, and superior court lost jurisdiction when the 180-day period expired without an extension); In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 780, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012) (superior court lost jurisdiction when 180-day time limitation expired, and juvenile court could not transfer the c......
  • State v. Baxter, No. A15A1272.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 2015
    ...lacked jurisdiction at time juvenile was indicted, approximately 300 days after his detention began).9 See In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 780–781, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012) (juvenile court could not negate statutory time limitations by transferring case back to superior court after su......
  • In re Interest of M.D.H., S16G0428
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • October 31, 2016
    ...circumstances as the original complaints. See D.V.H., 335 Ga.App. at 300, 779 S.E.2d 122. The court also cited In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012), in reasoning that allowing the State to file new complaints to reset the deadline for filing a delinquency petition ......
  • Johnson v. Ware, Nos. A11A1559
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • January 30, 2012
    ...contends the trial court erred by ordering that he pay one-half of the child's school and summer camp tuition outside of the overall [313 Ga.App. 778] calculation of child support. Ware concedes that the court's order regarding child support does not comply with the relevant Code sections. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • State v. Baxter, S16G0184
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • November 21, 2016
    ...deemed invalid, and superior court lost jurisdiction when the 180-day period expired without an extension); In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 780, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012) (superior court lost jurisdiction when 180-day time limitation expired, and juvenile court could not transfer the c......
  • State v. Baxter, No. A15A1272.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 2015
    ...lacked jurisdiction at time juvenile was indicted, approximately 300 days after his detention began).9 See In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 780–781, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012) (juvenile court could not negate statutory time limitations by transferring case back to superior court after su......
  • In re Interest of M.D.H., S16G0428
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • October 31, 2016
    ...circumstances as the original complaints. See D.V.H., 335 Ga.App. at 300, 779 S.E.2d 122. The court also cited In the Interest of C.B., 313 Ga.App. 778, 723 S.E.2d 21 (2012), in reasoning that allowing the State to file new complaints to reset the deadline for filing a delinquency petition ......
  • Johnson v. Ware, Nos. A11A1559
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • January 30, 2012
    ...contends the trial court erred by ordering that he pay one-half of the child's school and summer camp tuition outside of the overall [313 Ga.App. 778] calculation of child support. Ware concedes that the court's order regarding child support does not comply with the relevant Code sections. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT