In re Chelan Elec. Co.
Decision Date | 31 May 1929 |
Docket Number | 21625. |
Parties | In re CHELAN ELECTRIC CO. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Appeal from Superior Court, Chelan County; W. O. Parr, Judge.
Proceedings for the transfer of territory from School District No. 17 to School District No. 108 in Chelan County, objected to by the Chelan Electric Company. From an order transferring the property, the objector appeals. Affirmed.
Post & Russell, of Spokane, for appellant.
A. N Corbin, of Wenatchee, for respondent.
School district No. 108 and school district No. 17 are in Chelan county, the first-mentioned school district being a school district of the second class, while the other district is a district of the third class. Certain lands located in school district No. 17 are bounded on three sides by school district No. 108. The county school superintendent of Chelan county acting under section 4727, Rem. Comp. Stat., gave due notice of an intention to transfer this land from school district No. 17 to school district No. 108. A hearing was had findings made, and the property ordered transferred. Appellant, being the owner of the land in question, has protested at all times, and the matter has finally reached this court.
As we understand the record, no question is raised as to the regularity of the proceedings of the county school superintendent in making the transfer. The purpose of the transfer, as we understand it, was to bring more taxable property into school district No. 108.
The property transferred is rough, mountainous country, and there are no school children residing upon the property transferred, and it is valuable largely because of the improvements placed upon the land by appellant. The sole question involved here is, Can a property owner prevent the transfer of his property from one school district to another, his protest being based solely on the fact that his taxes will probably be increased? We think it might be well conceded that the district from which this property was taken might complain under certain circumstances, or the children residing within the district might complain under certain circumstances, but the protest is on behalf of the landowner only.
Our statute provides: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Application for Annexation of Common School Districts Nos. 18 and 21
... ... in the absence of a showing of abuse, of discretion on their ... part, which is not the case here.'" (In re ... Chelan Electric Co., 152 Wash. 412, 65 A. L. R. 1520, ... 278 P. 171, 172.) ... While ... in his memorandum decision the trial court construing ... ...
-
In re Consolidated School Dist. No. 25, Walla Walla County-100 Columbia County
... ... Calouri v. Stratton, 108 Wash. 485, 185 P. 610; ... School District No. 88 v. Morgan, 147 Wash. 321, 266 P. 150; ... In re Chelan Electric Co., 152 Wash. 412, 278 P ... 171, 65 A. L. R. 1520 ... In the ... case here presented, there was but one child ... ...
-
Altman v. Independent School Dist. of Gilmore City
... ... provisions are to be construed together ... In the notes, ... Annotations, found in 65 A.L.R. 1526, Re Chelan Electric Co., ... 152 Wash. 412, 278 P. 171, the test states: ... 'Sometimes, ... because of the peculiar wording of the statute, ... ...