In re Cluff
| Decision Date | 09 March 2017 |
| Citation | 148 A.D.3d 1346,47 N.Y.S.3d 919 (Mem) |
| Parties | In the Matter of Amanda Lynn CLUFF, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 5078746). |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Amanda Lynn Cluff, Brielle, New Jersey, pro se.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
Before: GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ.
Amanda Lynn Cluff was admitted to practice by this Court in 2012 and has previously listed a business address in Brielle, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration (hereinafter OCA). By affidavit sworn to June 16, 2016, Cluff seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.
Inasmuch as Cluff is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation, her application for that relief must be denied. According to OCA records, and as is emphasized by AGC, Cluff is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the 2016–2017 biennial period (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). It is beyond cavil that the failure to duly register constitutes "conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice" (Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ] ) and, therefore, attorney misconduct (see Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021 [2014]; Matter of Arms, 251 A.D.2d 743, 743–744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 156 [1998] ; Matter of Ryan, 238 A.D.2d 713, 713–714, 656 N.Y.S.2d 444 [1997] ; Matter of Farley, 205 A.D.2d 874, 874–875, 613 N.Y.S.2d 458 [1994] ). Accordingly, Cluff's failure to duly register is a bar to her nondisciplinary resignation, and her application must be denied (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Cluff must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see id. ).
ORDERED that Amanda Lynn Cluff's application to resign is denied.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Ezeala
...of Judiciary Law § 468–a , 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1031, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ; see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ]; Matter of Cluff , 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; Rules of Chief Admin. of Cts. [22 NYCRR] § 118.1 [h] ...
-
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A
...until she is reinstated (see generally Matter of Scaliti, 182 A.D.3d 982, 982, 120 N.Y.S.3d 884 [2020] ; Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ). Nonetheless, this Court has recently approved an expedited procedure where – when a respondent's request for reinstateme......
-
In re Creamer
... ... of Arms, 251 A.D.2d 743, 743744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 156 [1998] ; Matter of Ryan, 238 A.D.2d 713, 713714, 656 N.Y.S.2d 444 [1997] ; Matter of Farley, 205 A.D.2d 874, 874875, 613 N.Y.S.2d 458 [1994] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 12261227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Creamer must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law 468a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of ... ...
-
In re Lee-Davis
...N.Y.S.2d 458 [1994] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Lee–Dav......