In re Lee-Davis

Decision Date26 October 2017
Citation154 A.D.3d 1272,62 N.Y.S.3d 638
Parties In the Matter of Ayanna M. LEE–DAVIS, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4291373).
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ayanna M. Lee–Davis, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: LYNCH, J.P., ROSE, DEVINE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Ayanna M. Lee–Davis was admitted to practice by this Court in 2005 and lists a business address in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with the Office of Court Administration. Lee–Davis now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Lee–Davis is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to timely register for the biennial period beginning in 2017 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1 ). Inasmuch as Lee–Davis is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ]; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014]; Matter of Arms, 251 A.D.2d 743, 743–744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 156 [1998] ; Matter of Ryan, 238 A.D.2d 713, 713–714, 656 N.Y.S.2d 444 [1997] ; Matter of Farley, 205 A.D.2d 874, 874–875, 613 N.Y.S.2d 458 [1994] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Lee–Davis must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

ORDERED that Ayanna M. Lee–Davis's application for permission to resign is denied.

LYNCH, J.P., ROSE, DEVINE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Bhat
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Octubre 2017
  • In re Cain
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Enero 2018
    ...requirements for the most recent biennial period beginning earlier in 2017 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Lee–Davis , 154 A.D.3d 1272, 62 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba , 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1).......
  • In re Kneedler
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 Febrero 2018
    ...period beginning in 2017 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Levey, 155 A.D.3d 1300, 63 N.Y.S.3d 761 [2017]; Matter of Lee–Davis, 154 A.D.3d 1272, 1272, 62 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1).In reply to AGC's opposition, however, Kneedler has submit......
  • In re Murphy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Noviembre 2017
    ...fulfill his attorney registration requirements for the 2017–2018 biennial period (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Lee–Davis, 154 A.D.3d 1272, 62 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts. [22 NYCRR] § 11......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT