In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P., 05-05-01034-CV.

• Decision Date: 19 August 2005
• Docket Number: No. 05-05-01034-CV.,05-05-01034-CV.
• Citation: 193 S.W.3d 580
• Parties: In re DALLAS PETERBILT, LTD., L.L.P., Relator.
• Court: Texas Court of Appeals

193 S.W.3d 580

In re DALLAS PETERBILT, LTD., L.L.P., Relator.

No. 05-05-01034-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

August 19, 2005.

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 03-02664-F, Robert Frost, Judge.

David Watkins, Kevin Robinowitz, W. Carson Croft, Jenkins & Watkins, P.C., Dallas, for Relator.

Jeffrey C. Mateer, Randel Craig Shaffer, Mateer & Schaffer, P.C., Dallas, for Real Party In Interest.

Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and LANG.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice LANG.

Relator contends the trial judge abused his discretion in denying relator's plea in abatement and motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. See TEX.R.APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex.1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.