In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.
Decision Date | 16 June 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 05-0706.,05-0706. |
Citation | 196 S.W.3d 161 |
Parties | In re DALLAS PETERBILT, LTD., L.L.P., Relator. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
David Watkins, Kevin Robinowitz, Jenkins & Watkins, Dallas, for Relator.
Jeffrey C. Mateer, Randal Craig Shaffer, Mateer & Shaffer, L.L.P., Dallas, for Real Party In Interest.
In this original proceeding, relator Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P. seeks to compel arbitration of claims filed by its former employee, William Harris. The trial court denied Peterbilt's motion to stay proceedings and to compel arbitration, and the court of appeals summarily denied mandamus relief. 193 S.W.3d 580. Because the parties entered into a binding arbitration agreement that covers Harris's claims, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Peterbilt's motion to compel arbitration. We conditionally grant mandamus relief.
On January 1, 1999, American Truck-Source, Inc., Peterbilt's holding company, instituted a dispute resolution program. Part of this program required employees to resolve certain work-related disputes via binding arbitration. When Harris commenced his at-will employment with Peterbilt in December 1999, he received a copy of a "Summary Plan Description of Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims" (Summary), which outlined the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims. Harris claims he never received the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims, which is part of the record, but he signed an acknowledgment form indicating that he received the Summary and understood that by accepting employment, he was relinquishing his right to resolve covered claims "by filing a lawsuit or seeking damages in any federal, state, or municipal court of law . . . ." The Summary's list of covered claims includes tort, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, and also "[c]laims for a violation of any federal, state, or other governmental law." In March 2002, Peterbilt terminated Harris's employment, and in 2003, rather than request arbitration, Harris filed suit against Peterbilt in state district court for discrimination, retaliation, defamation, and other torts. Peterbilt then sought to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16.
An employer may enforce an arbitration agreement entered into during an at-will employment relationship if the employee received notice of the employer's arbitration policy and accepted it. In re Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc., 181 S.W.3d 370, 375 (Tex.App.2005) (per curiam) (citing In re Halliburton Co., 80 S.W.3d 566, 568 (Tex.2002)). In granting mandamus relief in Halliburton, we stressed the importance of notice and emphasized that the employee there received a one-page summary of the agreement to arbitrate. 80 S.W.3d at 568-69; see also Hathaway v. Gen. Mills, Inc., 711 S.W.2d 227, 229 (Tex. 1986) ( ). Harris argues that the Summary is immaterial and that only the underlying agreement itself, which he says he never received, can provide notice. We disagree. When determining whether an employee received notice of a binding arbitration agreement, our cases do not confine that "notice analysis" to the underlying agreement, but to all communications between the employer and employee. See In re Halliburton Co., 80 S.W.3d at 569 ( ); Hathaway, 711 S.W.2d at 229 ( ).
The six-page Summary and accompanying signed acknowledgment form notified Harris that arbitration would be required for resolving covered claims and specifically described which claims are covered under the plan. Harris contends he did not receive the Summary either. But the acknowledgment form states, right...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Long v. BDP Int'l, Inc.
...arbitration agreement, accepted the agreement, and raise claims that fall within the scope of the agreement. In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P., 196 S.W.3d 161, 162–63 (Tex.2006) (citing In re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc., 987 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Tex.1999) (per curiam)). The Opt-in Plaintiffs ......
-
Gilbert v. Indeed, Inc.
...of the agreement by the signatory is an acceptance of the arbitration agreement as a matter of law.") (citing In re Dall. Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P. , 196 S.W.3d 161, 163 (Tex. 2006) ). Plaintiff's argument, instead, is that the arbitration clause in the Confidentiality Agreement does not have......
-
APC Home Health Servs., Inc. v. Martinez
...564 S.W.3d at 117-18 ; Wright v. Hernandez , 469 S.W.3d 744, 757 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2015, no pet.) ; see also In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P., 196 S.W.3d 161, 163 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding) (at will employee who received notice of arbitration agreement and continued in employment b......
-
Alex Sheshunoff Management Serv. V. Johnson
...consideration beyond employment to create rights enforceable in contract. Arbitration is one example. See In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P., 196 S.W.3d 161, 163 (Tex.2006) (holding that an employee who receives notice of a modification of employment policy, the implementation of arbitrat......
-
Trends in litigating arbitration: using motions to compel arbitration and motions to vacate arbitration awards.
...Department [check] Stores, Inc., 198 S.W.3d 778 (Tex. 2006, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). In re Dallas Peterbilt, [check] Ltd. L.L.P., 196 S.W.3d 161 (Tex. 2006, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). In re American Nat'l [check] Insurance Co., 242 S.W.3d 831 (Tex. App. 2007, orig. proceeding). ......
-
Arbitration of employment claims
...to the underlying agreement, but to all communications between the employer and employee. See In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P. , 196 S.W.3d 161, 162 (Tex. 2006). Thus, under the strong Texas Supreme Court precedent in this area, Texas courts have applied this standard by enforcing arbit......
-
Arbitration of Employment Claims
...to the underlying agreement, but to all communications between the employer and employee. See In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P. , 196 S.W.3d 161, 162 (Tex. 2006). Thus, under the strong Texas Supreme Court precedent in this area, Texas courts have applied this standard by enforcing arbit......