In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 37079.

Decision Date19 June 1968
Docket NumberNo. 37079.,37079.
PartiesIn re FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

William P. Simmons, Jr., as President, and Henry P. Trawick, Jr., as Chairman, Florida Court Rules Committee.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are hereby amended in the following respects, viz.:

Rule 1.010 is amended to read:

"These rules apply to all suits of a civil nature and all special statutory proceedings in the circuit courts and civil courts of record and other trial courts except those to which the probate and guardianship rules or the summary claims procedure rules apply but the form, content, procedure and time for pleading in all special statutory proceedings shall be as prescribed by the statutes governing the proceedings unless these rules specifically provide to the contrary. These rules shall be construed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action. These rules shall be known and cited as the Rules of Civil Procedure and may be abbreviated as `RCP'."

Rule 1.020(d) (2) and (3) are combined and amended to read:

"Trial courts have the power to amend, rescind and adopt local rules not in conflict with any rule promulgated by the Supreme Court but the action is not effective until approved by the Supreme Court. Each trial court shall submit seven copies of all local rules to the Supreme Court when amended, rescinded or adopted."

Rule 1.100 is amended to read:

"(c) Contents. Every pleading or other paper shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the file number and a designation as in subdivision (a) or (b) of this rule and the name of the first party on each side with an appropriate indication of other parties."

Rule 1.250 is amended to read:

"(a) Misjoinder. Misjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissal of an action. Any claim against a party may be severed and proceeded with separately.

"(b) Dropping parties. Parties may be dropped by an adverse party in the manner provided for voluntary dismissal in Rule 1.420(a) (1) subject to the exception stated in that rule. If notice of lis pendens has been filed in the action against a party so dropped, the notice of dismissal shall be recorded and cancels the notice of lis pendens without the necessity of a court order. Parties may be dropped by order of court on its own initiative or the motion of any party at any stage of the action on such terms as are just.

"(c) Adding parties. Parties may be added once as a matter of course within the same time that pleadings can be so amended under Rule 1.190(a). If amendment by leave of court is permitted, parties may be added in the amended pleading without further order of court. Parties may be added by order of court on its own initiative or on motion of any party at any stage of the action and on such terms as are just."

Rule 1.340 is amended by lettering and subtitling each of the three paragraphs presently in the rule as follows:

"(a) Service; answer; objections.

"(b) Scope; protective orders.

"(c) Not binding on coparty. and by adding a paragraph to read as follows:

"(d) Continuing effect. Interrogatories do not have a continuing effect."

Rule 1.370 is amended to read:

"After commencement of an action a party may serve on any other party a written request for the admission by the latter of the genuineness of any relevant documents described in the request or of the truth of any relevant matters of fact set forth in the request. If a plaintiff desires to serve a request within ten days after service of process on the defendant, leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained. Copies of the documents shall be served with the request unless copies have already been furnished. Each of the matters of which an admission is requested shall be deemed admitted unless within twenty days after service thereof or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow on motion and notice, the party to whom the request is directed serves either (1) a sworn statement denying specifically the matters of which an admission is requested or setting forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully admit or deny those matters or (2) written objections on the ground that some or all of the requested admissions are privileged or irrelevant or that the request is otherwise improper in whole or in part with a notice of hearing the objections at the earliest practicable time. If written objections to a part of the request are made, the remainder of the request shall be answered. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission and when good faith requires that a party deny only a part or a qualification of a matter of which an admission is requested, he shall specify so much of it as is true and deny only the remainder."

Rule 1.410(a) is amended to read:

"(a) For Attendance of witnesses; forms; issuance.

(1) Every subpoena shall be issued by the clerk under the seal of the court and, when requested, shall state the name of the court and the title of the action and shall command each person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony at a time and place therein specified.

(2) On oral request of an attorney or party and without praecipe, the clerk shall issue a subpoena or a subpoena for the production of documentary evidence signed and sealed but otherwise in blank, both as to the title of the action and the name of the person to whom it is directed and the subpoena shall be filled in before service by the attorney or party."

Rule 1.420(b) is amended to read:

"(b) Involuntary Dismissal. Any party may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against him for failure of an adverse party to comply with these rules or any order of court. Notice of hearing on the motion shall be served as required under Rule 1.090(d). After a party seeking affirmative relief in an action tried by the court without a jury has completed the presentation of his evidence, any other party may move for a dismissal on the ground that on the facts and the law the party seeking affirmative relief has shown no right to relief, without waiving the right to offer evidence if the motion is not granted. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the party seeking affirmative relief or may decline to render judgment until the close of all the evidence. Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this subdivision and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or for improper venue or for lack of an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Wilson v. Salamon
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 20 d4 Outubro d4 2005
    ...if some "action has been taken by filing of pleadings, order of court, or otherwise" within the past year. In re Fla. Rules of Civil Procedure, 211 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1968). In addition, the commentary we added in 1976 explicitly echoed this plain meaning in explaining that a dismissal co......
  • Chemrock Corp.. v. Tampa Electric Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 22 d4 Setembro d4 2011
    ...taken by filing of pleadings, order of court or otherwise for a period of one year shall be dismissed....” In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 211 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla.1968). As we noted in Wilson, the term “affirmatively” was finally removed in its entirety from the rule when it was ame......
  • Charter Sch. USA, Inc. v. Doe
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 d3 Novembro d3 2014
    ...[the motion] is determined.” See In re Fla. Summary Claims Procedure Rules, 211 So.2d 553, 553 (Fla.1968) ; In re Fla. Rules of Civil Procedure, 211 So.2d 206, 208 (Fla.1968).With minor revisions not relevant here, Rule 1.550 has remained the same to this day with respect to “recordation” o......
  • Van Meter v. Singletary
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 d3 Outubro d3 1996
    ...Fla. Stat. is unconstitutional. I would affirm the trial court's ruling. 1 This rule was repealed effective 10/1/68. In re Fla. R. Civ. P., 211 So.2d 206, 208 (Fla.1968).2 Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.670 was also repealed effective 10/1/68, In re Fla. R. Civ. P., 211 So.2d 206, 208 (Fla.1968).3 Sec. 95.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT