IN RE FRAILS
| Decision Date | 25 November 2003 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | In the Matter of Randolph FRAILS, Respondent. |
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect clients' interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.
IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Richard W. Taylor, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Taylor shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Mr. Taylor may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.
This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Richard W. Taylor, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.
Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Richard W. Taylor, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent's mail and the authority to direct that respondent's mail be delivered to Mr. Taylor's office.
This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.
/s/Costa M. Pleicones, J. FOR THE COURT
To continue reading
Request your trial
- State v. Moore
- United States v. Doctor
- United States v. Croft
-
IN RE FRAILS
...directed to surrender his certificate to practice law. Respondent was subsequently placed on interim suspension. In the Matter of Frails, 356 S.C. 431, 589 S.E.2d 759 (2003). Respondent now petitions the Court to reinstate him to the practice of After consideration of respondent's submissio......