In Re Grubb, in Re

Citation156 So. 482,116 Fla. 387
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Decision Date07 September 1934
PartiesIn re GRUBB.

En Banc.

Application by Paul Grubb, trading and doing business as the Grubb Transfer Company, not incorporated, for an alternative writ of mandamus, requiring the Florida Railroad Commission to issue a 'for hire' permit to relator.

Alternative writ denied, without prejudice to right of relief by other appropriate remedy.

COUNSEL

Leo P. Kitchen and Dan R. Schwartz, both of Jacksonville, for petitioner.

OPINION

DAVIS Chief Justice.

This is an application for an alternative writ of mandamus against the Florida Railroad Commission to require it to issue to relator a 'for hire permit' to engage in carriage for hire of used household goods, furnishings, and furniture. Chapter 14764, Laws of Florida 1931. It is the relator's contention in this case that the issuance of a 'for hire' permit, as distinguished from a certificate of public convenience and necessity, is a mandatory duty devolving upon the Railroad Commission under the statute after an applicant has duly complied with all conditions precedent entitling applicant to have such permit issued, and that therefore mandamus, and not the usual writ of certiorari this court has held applicable, is the proper remedy in a case like the present. Florida Motor Lines, Inc., v Railroad Commissioners, 100 Fla. 538, 129 So. 876.

While upon its face section 5 of chapter 14764, Acts of 1931 allows to the Railroad Commission no discretion or judgment as to the granting of 'permits' to auto transportation companies to operate mere 'for hire' service [1] in this state, yet other provisions of chapter 14764, supra, vest in the Railroad Commission jurisdiction to determine whether or not what purports to be a mere 'for hire' service will be such in law and in fact under the circumstances of the proposed operation, and therefore it is not only within the power of the commission but it is its duty to have such hearing and to make such investigation and findings as will advise it in the premises where the nature and scope of the proposed service as outlined in an application suggests some special inquiry on that score.

The petition for the alternative writ herein sought sets up the Commission's Order No. 683 dated August 16, 1934, denying the applicant a permit after a hearing recited as having been had before the commission under date of July 18, 1934. The commission, after due notice, set the application down for a hearing in accordance with its special rules on the subject of investigations into matters of this kind the applicability or validity of which was not contested not objected to by relator at or prior to the hearing had on the rejected application.

Even were mandamus the appropriate remedy in an ordinary case of this kind, on the ground that certiorari is wholly inadequate to afford the plain, complete, and speedy remedy to which relator conceives himself entitled under the law (a point we do not now decide), the petition for the alternative writ should disclose the entire record of the proceedings upon which ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Kilgore v. Bird
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 24 Febrero 1942
    ...error, and writs of certiorari issued to review quasi judicial judgments or orders of quasi judicial bodies or officers. In re Paul Grubb, 116 Fla. 387, 156 So. 482. The common-law use of writ of certiorari to remove a cause from one court to another having trial jurisdiction of such remove......
  • Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley, P.A. v. Mullin
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 14 Julio 1992
    ...all of the parties who appeared and were heard as parties to the proceeding in which the challenged order was made." In re Grubb, 116 Fla. 387, 389, 156 So. 482, 483 (1934); State Beverage Dept. v. Willis, 159 Fla. 698, 700, 32 So.2d 580, 582 (1947); see Brigham v. Dade County, 305 So.2d 75......
  • State Beverage Dept. v. Willis
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 21 Noviembre 1947
    ... ... 538, 129 So. 876.' and that: ... '* * * certiorari lies to review the erroneous or ... unwarranted acts or proceedings of courts and public bodies ... exercising judicial or quasi judicial powers, where no remedy ... by appeal or writ of error is provided.' and in Re ... Paul Grubb, 116 Fla. 387, 389, 156 So. 482, 483, stated: ... 'The writ of certiorari, by removing to a reviewing ... court, the record of a subordinate tribunal whose order is ... sought to be quashed, brings before the reviewing court all ... of the parties who appeared and were heard as parties to the ... ...
  • Orlando Transit Co. v. Florida R.R. & Public Utilities Com'n
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 16 Julio 1948
    ... ... Section. The power to issue the permit is vested by law in ... the Railroad Commission. It cannot be issued under the above ... provision without a substantial compliance with the pertinent ... terms of the Act. We reaffirm our previous ruling on the ... point as enumerated in Re Grubb, 116 Fla. 387, 156 ... The pertinent ... allegations of the petition lodged with the Railroad ... Commission and the testimony of the witness Swope adduced in ... support there, clearly established the inference or ... conclusion that the petitioner was not seeking or requesting ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT