In re Interstate Outdoor Inc.
Decision Date | 16 September 2014 |
Docket Number | No. COA14–223.,COA14–223. |
Citation | 236 N.C.App. 294,763 S.E.2d 172 |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | In the Matter of: The Appeal of: INTERSTATE OUTDOOR INCORPORATED from the decision of the Johnston County Board of Equalization and Review regarding the valuation of certain business personal property for tax year 2012. |
Spence & Spence, P.A., Smithfield, by Robert A. Spence, for appellant Interstate Outdoor Incorporated.
David F. Mills, P.A., by David F. Mills, for appellee County of Johnston.
Interstate Outdoor, Inc. ("Interstate") appeals from two final decisions of the Property Tax Commission. It argues that the Commission erroneously affirmed ad valorem tax assessments for 2011 and 2012 made by Johnston County regarding 69 billboards it owns. We affirm the Commission's decisions because Interstate failed to produce substantial evidence that the valuation method used by Johnston County was arbitrary or illegal.
Interstate is a corporation that owns and rents out billboards in 40 counties in North Carolina, including approximately 80 billboards in Johnston County. Interstate appealed Johnston County Tax Administration's valuation of 60 billboards it owned in Johnston County for tax years 2011 and 2012, as well as nine new billboards it bought in 2012. For tax year 2011, the county valued Interstate's property at $2,547,577. Interstate asserts its property was actually worth $1,923,746. For tax year 2012, the county valued Interstate's property at $2,786,200. Interstate asserted that its property was actually worth $1,790,691. To value the billboards, Johnston County relied on the Billboard Structures Valuation Guide published by the North Carolina Department of Revenue, which is updated annually.
On appeal to the Property Tax Commission, Interstate argued that the county had significantly overestimated the value of its property and introduced what it considered the proper estimate for each billboard. To do so, it asked one of its normal billboard contractors for ten quotes on different types of billboards. It then used one of the ten quotes for each of the billboards of contested value. Additionally, Interstate highlighted that the 2011 and 2012 tax values were approximately eighteen percent higher than those for 2010. In 2010, Interstate had appealed the valuation of its billboards. The parties reached a negotiated settlement, which valued its property at $1,923,746. Interstate argued that the value should remain the same for the 2011 and 2012 tax years.
The Property Tax Commission found that Interstate failed to show that the quotes it used "included all the costs that make the property ready for its intended uses," or a substantial connection between the quotes and the actual costs of constructing the billboards at issue. It therefore affirmed Johnston County's valuation for both tax years, with one dissent. Interstate timely appealed to this Court.
N.C. Gen.Stat. § 105–345.2(b) (2011). "In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error." N.C. Gen.Stat. § 105–345.2(c).
––– N.C.App. ––––, 738 S.E.2d 802, 807 ( ), app. dismissed
and rev. allowed, ––– N.C. ––––, 747 S.E.2d 526 (2013), disc. rev. improvidently allowed, – –– N.C. ––––, 753 S.E.2d 152 (2014). "If the court finds substantial evidence to support the Commission's decision, the Commission's decision may not be overturned." Matter of Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp., 113 N.C.App. 562, 571, 439 S.E.2d 778, 783 (1994), aff'd in part, 340 N.C. 93, 455 S.E.2d 431 (1995).
Although Interstate frames its arguments on appeal as four distinct issues, in reality, it raises but one. In essence, it argues that the County used an illegal and arbitrary method of valuation because it followed the Department of Revenue schedules for the valuation of billboards without taking into account local conditions in Johnston County.
––– N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 741 S.E.2d 416, 419–20 (2013).
Thus, we must first consider whether there is substantial evidence in the record, considering it as a whole, to support the Commission's conclusion that Interstate failed to carry its burden of showing that Johnston County used an arbitrary or illegal method of valuation.
N.C. Gen.Stat. § 105–291(g) (2011) authorizes the Department of Revenue to "develop and recommend standards and rules to be used by tax supervisors and other responsible officials in the appraisal of specific kinds and categories of property for taxation." The Local Government Division of the Department of Revenue created a Billboard Structures Valuation Guide ("Billboard Guide") for tax years 2011 and 2012. Johnston County used the guide to appraise Interstate's billboards for the relevant tax years.
The Billboard Guide recommended applying a replacement cost approach to valuation because of the difficulty of acquiring the information necessary to accurately value billboards using either the income or sales comparison approaches.1 The schedule was created based on data "extracted from material costs, labor, and other integral components of billboard construction." George Hermane, the personal property manager for Johnston County Tax Administration, testified that use of a sales or income approach would not be possible because the necessary information is not normally available. As a result, the Billboard Guide suggests that "[t]he valuation of each sign ... be determined by calculating the replacement cost new (RCN) and then deducting depreciation based on an effective age depreciation schedule."
The Billboard Guide divides billboards into four general categories: (1) wood structures, (2) steel "A–Frame" structures, (3) multi-mast structures, and (4) monopole structures. It then further divides the various classes of billboards into subclasses based on the size, height, and number of panels and design. The Billboard Guide...
To continue reading
Request your trial