In re Olson

Citation252 S.W.3d 747
Decision Date15 April 2008
Docket NumberNo. 14-08-00270-CV.,14-08-00270-CV.
PartiesIn re Clifford G. OLSON, III, Relator.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

Clifford G. Olson III, Rosharon, pro se.

Panel consists of Justices YATES, GUZMAN, and BROWN.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On March 21, 2008, Relator, Clifford G. Olson, III, filed a petition for writ of injunction and an application for restraining order in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52.1. Relator requests that we issue the writ and the restraining order to prevent Harris County District Clerk Theresa Chang from disposing of evidence.

The purpose of a writ of injunction is to enforce or protect the appellate court's jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 683 (Tex.1989) (orig.proceeding); In re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding). The use of a writ of injunction is limited to cases in which we have actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. In re Wyatt, 110 S.W.3d 511 (Tex.App.-Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Relator has no other proceeding pending in this court.

Moreover, a writ of injunction is issued by a superior court to control, limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. In re State, 180 S.W.3d 423, 425 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2005, orig. proceeding). The District Clerk is not a court. We do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ against a district clerk unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).

Because we lack jurisdiction over this proceeding, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of injunction and application for temporary restraining order.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • In re Moore
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • February 24, 2021
    ...Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683; In re Murphy, 484 S.W.3d 655, 656 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Olson, 252 S.W.3d 747, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1, 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003,......
  • In re Moore
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • February 24, 2021
    ...Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683; In re Murphy, 484 S.W.3d 655, 656 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Olson, 252 S.W.3d 747, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1, 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003,......
  • In re Moore
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • December 19, 2019
    ...Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683; In re Murphy, 484 S.W.3d 655, 656 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Olson, 252 S.W.3d 747, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1, 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003,......
  • In re Smith, NUMBER 13-20-00528-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • December 10, 2020
    ...683 (Tex. 1989) (orig. proceeding); In re Murphy, 484 S.W.3d 655, 656 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Olson, 252 S.W.3d 747, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Sheshtawy, 161 S.W.3d 1, 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT