In re Wyatt, 10-03-078-CV.
| Decision Date | 28 May 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 10-03-078-CV.,10-03-078-CV. |
| Citation | 110 S.W.3d 511 |
| Parties | In re Sterling Wayne WYATT and Ruth Ann Wyatt. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Sterling Wayne Wyatt, Ruth Ann Wyatt, Hewitt, pro se.
Tommy Bastian, Barrett, Burke, Wilson, Castle, Daffin & Frappier, Addison, for others.
Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.
OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING
On April 1, 2003, we denied the relators' motion for a writ of prohibition without an opinion. Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(d). They have filed a motion for rehearing, requesting clarification of the reason for our denial. A writ of prohibition may properly be used by this Court only to protect our jurisdiction. In re Salas, 994 S.W.2d 422, 423 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, orig. proceeding). Its use is limited to cases in which this Court has actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. Id. The relators' petition does not assert any manner in which our jurisdiction is in jeopardy of being lost due to the events about which they are complaining.
Relators' motion for rehearing is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Moore
...in which we have actual jurisdiction over a pending proceeding. In re Murphy, 484 S.W.3d at 656; In re Olson, 252 S.W.3d at 747; In re Wyatt, 110 S.W.3d 511, 511 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Like the writ of prohibition and in contrast to a writ of mandamus, a writ of injunction......
- Stowe v. State
-
In re Olson
...proceeding). The use of a writ of injunction is limited to cases in which we have actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. In re Wyatt, 110 S.W.3d 511 (Tex.App.-Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Relator has no other proceeding pending in this Moreover, a writ of injunction is issued by a su......
-
In re Murphy
...2004). Thus, our use of a writ of injunction is limited to cases in which we have actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. In re Wyatt, 110 S.W.3d 511, 511 (Tex.App.–Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Relator has no other proceeding pending in this court.2 Therefore, we have no authority to ......