In re Santosuosso
Decision Date | 06 July 1945 |
Citation | 318 Mass. 489,62 N.E.2d 105 |
Parties | MATTER OF JOSEPH SANTOSUOSSO. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
April 4, 1945.
Present: FIELD, C.
J., DOLAN, RONAN WILKINS, & SPALDING, JJ.
Attorney at Law. Practice, Civil, Membership in bar. Evidence, Competency, In disbarment proceeding, Evidence in another proceeding Findings in another proceeding.
Statement by DOLAN J., as to the nature of an inquiry, upon an information filed with the court, into alleged misconduct of an attorney at law.
The evidence adduced at the hearing of a suit in equity against an attorney at law at which he was present and represented by counsel, is admissible in a subsequent inquiry into alleged misconduct on his part upon an information filed with the court, and is entitled to such weight as the court may deem proper; but findings of material facts made by the trial judge in such suit in equity are not admissible in the inquiry.
INFORMATION, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk on December 21, 1943.
A report to the full court was made by Qua, J.
N. Leonard, designated to conduct the proceedings.
F.
L. Simpson, for Santosuosso.
This is an inquiry into certain alleged misconduct of Joseph Santosuosso, Esquire, a member of the bar. The proceeding came before a single justice of this court upon an information filed by the Bar Association of the City of Boston. The case comes before us upon a report of the single justice as follows:
Counsel for Mr. Santosuosso argues that the proffered evidence is not admissible under the doctrine of res judicata, and also that, apart from the doctrine of res judicata, the statements made by the judge of the Superior Court in his findings and decree are inadmissible as evidence. These contentions call for a consideration of the nature of the present proceeding. It is settled that it is an inquiry and not an adversary proceeding. Boston Bar Association v. Casey, 211 Mass. 187 , 191-192. Matter of Keenan, 287 Mass. 577 , 583. It is commenced not by a petition for disbarment but rather by an information wherein the matters there set forth are brought to the attention of the court with a prayer, not for disbarment or other specific disciplinary action, but rather for such action as the court may deem fit. It is in essence a submission to the court of the alleged facts for investigation by the court and such disposition as the court deems proper. The counsel designated by the court to conduct the proceeding is but an officer nominated by the court to assist in the inquiry to be made by the court itself. The proceeding is not an action at law in the strict sense nor a suit in equity. As was said in Boston Bar Association v. Casey, 211 Mass. 187 , 191, it "is not a proceeding between two parties where the court is asked to adjudicate conflicting claims as to some right, corporeal or incorporeal, and where a decision favorable to one party is necessarily to that extent unfavorable to the other." The respondent is entitled to a fair trial in the light of the character of the proceeding, and to that end an opportunity to know all that he must meet and the right to present such evidence as he may be able to produce to rebut the representations of alleged misconduct.
A citation of the numerous cases decided in this jurisdiction and elsewhere, in which the required character of members of the bar and the powers and the duties of the court with respect to admission to and removal from the bar are considered, would serve no useful purpose. They are crystallized in Matter of Keenan, 314 Mass. 544 , where the court said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Levine, Matter of
...or inapplicable to the proceedings before us. Even in the leading Massachusetts disciplinary case respondent cites, In re Santosuosso, 318 Mass. 489, 62 N.E.2d 105 (1945), the court, in discussing the preclusive effect of the proffered evidence, We are unwilling to attach such conclusive ef......
-
Troy, In re
...by only four (Santiago, Williams, Ward--now Young, and Haley) of the defendants involved in those cases. See Matter of Santosuosso, 318 Mass. 489, 492-493, 62 N.E.2d 105. Thus, this court is in the position of having to find the facts of the cases almost entirely on the basis of transcripts......
-
Gygi, In re
...itself--rather than the conclusions previously drawn from that evidence--should have been introduced. See In re Santosuosso, 318 Mass. 489, 495, 62 N.E.2d 105, 161 A.L.R. 892 (1945); Cf. State v. Gudmundsen, 145 Neb. 324, 328--29, 16 N.W.2d 474 (1944). To summarize, it is our conclusion tha......
-
Tennessee Bar Ass'n v. Freemon
...of Mrs. Spinks as evidence in this case the Bar Association relies most strongly upon the leading case of Re Santosuosso, 318 Mass. 489, 62 N.E.2d 105, 161 A.L.R. 892. That case involved an inquiry into the professional conduct of Attorney Santosuosso. As to the opinion points out, it was n......