In re Warr's Estate
Decision Date | 03 May 1943 |
Docket Number | 15041. |
Citation | 111 Colo. 85,137 P.2d 408 |
Parties | In re WARR'S ESTATE. v. GREEN et al. ROGERS |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
In Department.
Error to County Court, City and County of Denver; C. E. Kettering Judge.
Proceedings in the matter of the Estate of Isabel Warr, deceased. On petition for determination of heirship between Elizabeth Warr Rogers, adopted child of predeceased brother of decedent and James Bird Green and others, cousins of decedent. To review a judgment determining that cousins were heirs at law Elizabeth Warr Rogers brings error.
Affirmed.
Albert J. Gould, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Grant Shafroth & Toll and Charles H. Haines, Jr., all of Denver for defendants in error.
Isabel Warr, a resident of the City and County of Denver, died intestate March 21, 1941. Defendants in error are cousins of deceased, and will be designed as such in this opinion. Plaintiff in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as the adoptee, was legally adopted in Illinois in 1916 by Will Warr, a predeceased brother of decedent, who, had he survived her, would have been her sole and only heir at law. On petition filed in the county court for determination of heirship, the cousins were adjudged heirs at law of decedent, and the adoptee, being denied the right to inherit, brings the case here for review on writ of error. The sole issue is the right of the adoptee to inherit through her adopting parent as against kindred by blood.
Concerning the adoption of children, Laws of Colorado, 1876, page 38, pertinent here, in substance, provided:
'Section 1. If any person * * * desire to adopt any child, * * * as his, or her heir, it shall be lawful for such person to do the same by deed, * * *.
* * *
* * *
Subsequent amendments, pertinent here, are Session Laws of 1885, p. 17, div. 1, § 1, Revised Statutes, 1908, p. 289, § 526, which, inter alia, provided:
Session Laws of 1911, ch. 1; Compiled Laws of 1921, § 5512, inter alia, provided:
Section 5512, Compiled Laws, 1921, supra, was amended by Session Laws, 1931, p. 150, ch. 51, which, inter alia, provided:
Session Laws, 1885, p. 18, § 3; R.S., 1908, p. 289, § 528; Compiled Laws 1921, p. 487, § 5514, ch. 120; S.L.1931, p. 152, § 4 ch. 51; '35 C.S.A., p. 31,§ 4, ch, 4, all, inter alia, provide: 'When the foregoing provisions are complied with * * * the court * * * shall make a decree * * * declaring that from that date such child, to all legal intents and purposes, is the child of the petitioner, * * *.'
Session Laws, 1885, p. 18, § 4; R.S., 1908, p. 290, § 529; Compiled Laws 1921, p. 1487, § 5515, ch. 120, inter alia, provided: 'The natural parents shall, by such order, be divested of all legal rights and obligations in respect to the child * * *; such child shall be to all intents and purposes the child and legal heir of the person so adopting him or her, entitled to all the rights and privileges, * * * of a child of such person begotten in lawful wedlock; but upon the decease of such person and the subsequent decease of such adopted child without issue, the property of such adopting parent shall descend to his or her next of kin, and not to the next of kin of such adopted child.'
This section was amended by S.L., 1927, p. 183, § 1, ch. 59; S.L., 1931, p. 152, § 5, ch. 51; '35 C.S.A. p. 32, § 5, ch. 4, both of which provided: 'The natural parents shall by such order, be divested fo all legal rights and obligations in respect to the child * * *; such child shall be to all intents and purposes the child and legal heir of the person so adopting him or her, entitled to all the rights and privileges * * * of a child of such person begotten in lawful wedlock; upon the death of an adopted child who is survived by neither spouse nor descendant all of his property which is not otherwise disposed of by will shall descend to the family of which he is a member by adoption, as if he had been born a member of such family; and neither his natural parents nor any other member of his natural family shall be entitled to any rights by virtue of any of the intestate laws of this state.'
Session Laws, 1903, p. 469, § 1, and p. 471, § 3; R.S., 1908, §§ 7040, 7042; Compiled Laws, 1921, §§ 5151, 5154; '35 C.S.A., §§ 1, 4, ch. 176 provide:
'Whenever any person having * * * property * * * shall die intestate * * * it shall descend * * * to his kindred, male and female * * *.
* * *
This section was amended by Session Laws, 1941, p. 908, c. 235, § 16, which provides:
The right of the adoptee to inherit is to be determined by the law in force March 21, 1941, the date of the death of Isabel Warr. 2 C.J.S., Adoption of Children, p. 454, § 63; Brooks Bank & Trust Co. v. Rorabacher, 118 Conn. 202, 171 A. 655. The act of 1941 was approved April 17, 1941. It therefore did not affect the rights of the adoptee, and will not be considered further.
The cousins contend that the rights of the adoptee should be determined by the law of Illinois in effect in 1916, the year of the adoption in that state, but as a consideration of that question is not necessary for our decision here, it will not be passed upon. In 1915 we determined the relation created by adoption in Russell v. Jordan, 58 Colo. 445, 147 P. 693, 694, Ann.Cas.1916C, 760, and held that it 'is regarded as personal between the adopting parent and adopted child.' There are divergent lines of authorities in this county, one holding that inheritance follows the blood, and that an adopted child inherits only from the adopting parent and not through it; the other, that an adopted child inherits as fully as a child of the blood. The former is the doctrine of the Ohio and other cases cited by us in Russell v. Jordan, supra, namely: Upson v.Noble, 35 Ohio St. 655; Phillips v. McConica, 59 Ohio St. 1, 51 N.E. 445, 69 Am.St.Rep. 753; Helms v. Elliott, 89 Tenn. 446, 14 S.W. 930, 10 L.R.A. 535; Hockaday v. Lynn, 200 Mo. 456, 98 S.W. 585, 8 L.R.A.,N.S., 117, 118 Am.St.Rep. 672, 9 Ann.Cas. 775; Boaz v. Swinney, 79 Kan. 332, 99 P. 621; Hole v. Robbins, 53 Wis. 514, 10 N.W. 617; Van Derlyn v. Mack, 137 Mich. 146, 100 N.W. 278, 66 L.R.A. 437, 107 Am.St.Rep. 669, 4 Ann.Cas. 879.
Among cases taking a contrary view are: Humphries v. Davis, 100 Ind. 274, 50 Am.Rep. 788; Hilpire v. Claude, 109 Iowa 159, 80 N.W. 332, 46 L.R.A. 171, 77 Am.St.Rep. 524; Calhoun v. Bryant, 28 S.D. 266, 133 N.W. 266; In re Taylor's Estate, 136 Neb. 227, 285 N.W. 538; McCune v. Oldham, 213 Iowa 1221, 240 N.W. 678; In re Moore's Estate, 7 Cal.App.2d 722, 47 P.2d 533, 48 P.2d 28; Warner v. King, 267 Ill. 82, 107 N.E. 837; In re Cave's Estate, 326 Pa. 358, 192 A. 460; In re Cook's Estate, 187 N.Y. 253, 79 N.E. 991; Carpenter v. Buffalo General Electric Co., 213 N.Y. 101, 106 N.E. 1026, Ann.Cas.1916C, 754.
The first adoptive statute enacted in this state in 1876 provided for adoption by deed. The act of 1885 provided for the adoption of minors upon petition to a court of record. In 1911, section 1 of that act was amended to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estate of David v. Snelson
...the law of inheritance existing at the date of the intestate's death. David, 762 P.2d at 745-46 (citing Estate of Warr, 111 Colo. 85, 89, 137 P.2d 408, 410 (1943)). It interpreted the law of intestate succession in effect at David's death, section 15-11-109(1)(a), 6B C.R.S. (1987), as requi......
-
Brunton v. International Trust Co.
... ... two life insurance policies as 'husband' was entitled ... to the proceeds thereof, as against the claim of the ... administrator of the estate of deceased insured, although he ... was not in fact her husband, the latter term being construed ... to be merely descriptio personae. We know of ... ...
-
In re Frazier's Estate
...by the family of which the child is a member by adoption, does not grant a reciprocal right in the adopted child. See In re Warr's Estate, 111 Colo. 85, 137 P. (2d) 408, and Coffman v. Howell, 111 Colo. 359, 141 P. (2d) But, since defendant cannot, in view of the decision in Hayes' Estate, ......
-
Miller's Trust, In re, 9523
...of the adoptive parent. 2 C.J.S. Adoption of Children § 63, pp. 452, 455; 1 Am.Jur., Adoption of Children, § 63, p. 662; Estate of Warr, 111 Colo. 85, 137 P.2d 408; Estate of Pierce, supra; In re Harrington's Estate, 96 Utah 252, 85 P.2d 630, 120 A.L.R. 830. Our succession statutes, referre......