In the Matter of Davis v. Davis, 2004-03342.
Decision Date | 27 December 2004 |
Docket Number | 2004-03342. |
Citation | 13 A.D.3d 623,2004 NY Slip Op 09632,787 N.Y.S.2d 113 |
Parties | In the Matter of GRACE DAVIS, Respondent, v. MELVILLE DAVIS, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A child support order deriving from a separation agreement incorporated but not merged with a judgment of divorce, as is the case here, may be modified by a court "upon a showing that the agreement was not fair and equitable when entered into, or that an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances has occurred resulting in a concomitant need" (Merl v Merl, 67 NY2d 359, 362 [1986]; see Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210, 213 [1977]). Moreover, the change in circumstances must be substantial (see Beard v Beard, 300 AD2d 268 [2002]). Where the change in circumstances is the loss of employment, a party seeking a downward modification must make a good-faith effort at seeking re-employment commensurate with his or her qualifications and experience (see Matter of Madura v Nass, 304 AD2d 579, 580 [2003]; Matter of Musumeci v Musumeci, 295 AD2d 516 [2002]; Matter of Austein-Gillman v Gillman, 292 AD2d 524 [2002]). In the case where a party loses his job due to an injury, the party has the same obligation to find some other type of employment, unless that party can demonstrate that he or she is unable to perform other work (see Matter of McCarthy v McCarthy, 2 AD3d 735 [2003]). Here, the evidence amply supports the Hearing Examiner's finding that the father, permanently partially disabled, made no effort to find a job in another line of work that was not as physically demanding as his former job as a bricklayer. The father had not attempted to seek retraining in preparation for looking for different work. That the father may not have completed high school does not relieve him of his obligation to seek other work. A parent's child support obligation is not necessarily determined by his or her current financial condition, but rather by his or her...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Szalapski v. Schwartz, 2003/8830.
... ... child support obligations, and unique job skills, is required as a matter of law to expand his search for employment if the consequence of accepting ... Davis v. Davis, 13 A.D.3d 623, 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 113 (2d Dep't 2004), citing ... ...
-
Straker v. Maynard-Straker
...133 A.D.3d 86521 N.Y.S.3d 288In the Matter of Uric STRAKER, respondent,v.Debra MAYNARDSTRAKER, appellant.Supreme ... with his or her qualifications and experience" (Matter of Davis v. Davis, 13 A.D.3d 623, 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 113 ; see Matter of Dimaio v ... ...
-
In the Matter of Linda Malbin v. Martz
... ... current financial condition, but rather by his or her ability to provide support ( Matter of Davis v. Davis, 13 A.D.3d 623, 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 113; see Matter of Brunetti v. Brunetti, 22 A.D.3d 577, ... ...
-
Flanigan v. Smyth
...2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 0869990 A.D.3d 1107933 N.Y.S.2d 759In the Matter of Thomas E. FLANIGAN, Appellant,v.Bonnie Jean SMYTH, Respondent.Supreme ... , but rather by his or her ability to provide support ( Matter of Davis v. Davis, 13 A.D.3d 623, 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 113 [2004], lv. dismissed 5 ... ...