Inc. v. Inc.
Citation | 1909 OK 278,105 P. 664,24 Okla. 892 |
Decision Date | 09 November 1909 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 229 |
Parties | INCORPORATED TOWN OF WESTVILLE v. INCORPORATED TOWN OF STILLWELL et al. |
Court | Supreme Court of Oklahoma |
¶0 1. COUNTIES--County Seat Election--Contest--Parties. This court acquires jurisdiction of a proceeding to contest the result of a county seat election under article 4, c. 31, pp. 378-387, Sess. Laws 1907-08, when the application therefor is filed within 30 days after such election has been held.
(a) Any additional necessary party may be made on proper application and showing after the expiration of such 30 days.
(b) It not being shown that Adair county as a political organization has any interest in this contest and no application having been made by the proper representatives of the county to be made a party hereto, this proceeding will be proceeded with without requiring it to be joined as a party thereto.
2. COUNTIES--County Seat Election--Qualification of Voters--Mandatory Provisions. Section 12, art. 4, c. 31, p. 382, Sess. Laws 1907-08. providing that "every person desiring to vote at such special election * * * shall, before being given a ballot, permit the clerks to fill out an affidavit and * * * shall subscribe and swear to said affidavit, * * *" is mandatory.
3. COUNTIES--County Seat Election--Majority Determination. For the purpose of determining the majority of the votes cast at a special election held to vote upon the removal or relocation of a county seat under the provisions of section 6, art. 17, Const. , and article 4, c. 31, pp. 378-387, Sess. Laws 1907-08, all the ballots cast on such question by the qualified electors of the county, making an honest though ineffectual effort to participate therein or have their ballots counted on the removal of the county seat, a majority of this number must be cast so as to be counted in favor of one of the contesting places before any town, city, or place shall be declared to be the county seat as a result of such election.
4. SAME--"Vote Cast." A ballot voted by a qualified elector without his having subscribed and sworn to the affidavit, as required by section 12. art. 4, c. 31, p. 382. Sess. Laws 1907-08, cannot be counted for any city, town, or place as a candidate for the county seat at such election.
(a) Such ballot, however, where the elector was qualified and acted in good faith, should be considered as a vote cast in estimating the number on which the required majority for the removal or relocation of the county seat is to be computed.
(b) The term, "vote cast," includes a ballot voted by a qualified elector, acting in good faith and failing to comply with the mandatory requirements imposed upon him in voting at such special election by section 12, supra, even though it precludes such vote from being counted for the town, city, or place for which he intended to vote.
5. COUNTIES--County Seat Election--Failure to Elect--Second Election. If by virtue of section 6, art. 17, Const., a majority of the votes cast at a special election shall not be received by or counted in favor of any city. town, or place voted for thereat, and there being more than two candidates for the location of the county seat at such election. the names of all except the two receiving the greatest number of votes shall be dropped, and the Governor shall in like time and manner cause to be held a second election at which only the said two towns shall be voted for.
(a) In the event none of the candidates at said first election received a majority of the votes cast thereat, there being only two candidates (cities, towns or places voted for thereat), the Governor shall then in like time and manner cause to be held a second election at which the said two towns shall be voted for, and the town receiving the requisite majority of the votes cast at the second election shall be the county seat.
Original action to contest a county seat election by the Incorporated Town of Westville against the Incorporated Town of Stillwell and others. Judgment rendered.
Owen & Stone, for plaintiff. No copy of brief reached the reporter.
R. Y. Nance and Arnold & Weston, for defendants.-- Citing: 6 A. & E. Enc. L. 325; Bowser v. Smith, 3 Mo. 45; Daly v. Petroff, 10 Phila. 389; State Board of Freeholders, 35 N.J. Law, 269; Fowler v. State (Tex.) 3 S.W. 255; Tarbox v. Sughrue, 36 Kan. 225; Lowe v. Wheeler, 2 Ellsw. El. Cas. 61; Clark v. Robinson, 88 Ill. 504; Quinn v. Lattermore, 120 N.C. 426; Pain on Elections, sec. 360.
¶1 The questions essential to be decided for a proper disposition of this case are as follows:
¶2 And section 20, that:
"Any election officer who shall be appointed or commissioned under the provisions of this act or the laws of Oklahoma, and who shall knowingly and wilfully fail or refuse to perform the duties required of him shall be guilty of a felony."
¶3 The intention of the Legislature to impose the burdens, not only upon the election officers, but also upon the electors of additional duties, is apparent. This affidavit in form gives the age, race, and number of years that the elector has been a resident of the county and state, and the ward or precinct in which he then...
To continue reading
Request your trial