Independent School Dist. v. Salvatierra, 8515.
Decision Date | 29 October 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 8515.,8515. |
Citation | 33 S.W.2d 790 |
Parties | INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al. v. SALVATIERRA et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Val Verde County; Joseph Jones, Judge.
Suit by Jesus Salvatierra and others against the Independent School District, known as the Inhabitants of the Town of Del Rio, and others. Judgment granting an injunction, and defendants appeal.
Reversed, and injunction dissolved.
Boggess, LaCrosse & Lowrey and Brian Montague, all of Del Rio, for appellants.
John L. Dodson, of Del Rio, M. C. Gonzales, of San Antonio, and J. T. Canales, of Brownsville, for appellees.
On January 7, 1930, the board of trustees of the independent school district embracing the city of Del Rio, ordered an election to be held within the district on February 1, 1930, to determine if the district should issue and sell its bonds in the sum of $185,000, "for the purpose of constructing and equipping public free school buildings of material other than wood and the purchase of the necessary sites therefor in said school district," and authorizing the levy and collection of taxes to pay off said bonds. At the ensuing election the proposition was adopted, and in due course the bonds were issued and sold. The validity of the election and of the issuance and sale of the bonds is not in question in this appeal.
The district owns, and its school buildings are located upon, a unit of land, oblong but irregular in shape, with an apparent approximate length of 1,200 feet. At the time the bond issue was voted there were four school buildings and a school athletic field upon this property, located as follows, from east to west: The high school, two elementary schools, the athletic field, and the third elementary school, designated the "Mexican" or "West End" school, consisting of two rooms. The program adopted by the trustees as a result of the bond issue provided for the construction of a new senior high school building, and remodeling and enlarging the elementary schools. The "West End" school, constructed of brick and tile, was to be enlarged by adding five rooms, including an auditorium of the same material.
It developed upon the trial that the West End building had been used for housing and teaching children exclusively of Spanish or Mexican descent who are in elementary grades up to and including the "low third." The district superintendent and one of the principals undertook in their testimony to explain the causes and purposes of this classification, or, as it amounts to, segregation. It was explained that as much as or more than half of those pupils go each autumn with their families to other localities where they engage in picking cotton or other farm work until the school terms are well advanced. Other pupils, entering at the beginning of the term, have thus progressed materially into the year's work, and it is the theory of the school authorities that the late comers will be handicapped in their morale and work if allocated with those having from one to four months' advantage over them in attendance, training, and progress. The superintendent testified as follows in elaboration of this situation:
The superintendent further testified:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Texas Education Agency
...1955, 226 F.2d 399; Hernandez v. Driscoll Consol. Ind. School District, S.D.Tex.1957, 2 Race Rel.L.R. 329; Ind. School District v. Salvatierra, 33 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App. 1930), cert. denied 284 U.S. 580, 52 S.Ct. 28, 76 L.Ed. 503 (1931); Clifton v. Puente, 218 S.W.2d 272 (Tex.Civ.App. See......
-
Graves v. Barnes
...be surprising, since that principle has long been established in Texas law." See generally Jesus Salvatierra v. Inhabitants of Del Rio Independent School District, 33 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App.1930), appeal dismissed, w. o. j., and cert. denied, 284 U.S. 580, 52 S.Ct. 28, 76 L.Ed. 503 (1931);......
-
United States v. State of Tex.
...English and were often late in arriving at school because their families engaged in migrant labor. See, e. g., Independent School District v. Salvatierra, 33 S.W.2d 790, 791-93 (Tex.Civ.App. ÔÇö San Antonio 1930), cert. denied 284 U.S. 580, 52 S.Ct. 28, 76 L.Ed. 503 (1931). In fact, the dis......
-
United States v. State of Tex.
...language differences could furnish the justification for separate Mexican-American schools. Independent School District v. Salvatierra, 33 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio, 1930), cert. denied, 284 U.S. 580, 52 S.Ct. 28, 76 L.Ed. 503 (1931). Both before and after the Salvatierra decisio......
-
Race, culture, and adoption: lessons from Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield.
...337 (W.D. Tex. 1897) (holding that, from an anthropological perspective, Mexicans are not white) with Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Salvatierra, 33 S.W.2d 790, 795 (Tex. Civ. App. 1930) (holding that the city could not segregate Mexican American children from children of "other white races" (emphasi......