Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 23577
| Decision Date | 08 September 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 23577,23577 |
| Citation | 222 Ga. 436,150 S.E.2d 618 |
| Parties | INTERSTATE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. John H. CHATTAM. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Chance & Maddox, J. C. Maddox, Calhoun, for appellant.
John D. Edge, Calhoun, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The Court of Appeals has requested answers to the following certified questions where a notice of appeal states that it is an appeal 'from (a) jury verdict': (1) Does the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Code Ann. § 6-809; Ga.L.1965, pp. 18, 29; 1965, pp. 240, 241; 1966, pp. 493, 500) authorize appellate courts to cause the notice of appeal to be perfected by requiring the appeal to be amended to show an appeal from the judgment or to treat the appeal from the verdict as a substantial compliance with the statute; and (2) if the answer to the first question is in the negative, is it the duty of the appellate courts to inquire into their own jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal? Held:
The statute (Ga.L.1965, pp. 18, 20; Code Ann. § 6-802) explicitly states in Sec. 4 that a notice of appeal must contain a concise statement of the 'judgment, ruling or order' entitling the appellant to appeal. Then to unerringly guide anyone who can read, in Sec. 20 (Code Ann. §§ 6-1201 et seq.), there is set forth a form of an appeal which contains a blank to be filled out with a description of the 'order or judgment' entered in the action. Indeed this court held in Gibson v. Hodges, 221 Ga. 779, 147 S.E.2d 329, that an appeal was fatal by defective when it failed to designate 'any appealable judgment or order as the ruling that entitles the appellant to take the appeal.' The Court of Appeals has no magicians that we know of, hence it can not know the appellant's intent other than he expressed it when he said the appeal was from a verdict, hence there is no other record indicated that would be relevant to order up under Code Ann. § 6-809 (). With all of the court's sympathy for lawyers and litigants, it can not constitutionally provide the procedure of appeals nor engage in the practice of law by directing the judgments or orders on appeal when the appellant has not chosen to appeal therefrom. Where there is only an appeal from a jury verdict, there is nothing to review, and the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction since it is a court for the corrections of errors of law alone. Code Ann. §§ 2-3704, 2-3708, Const. art....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fullwood v. Sivley
...jurisdiction from the outset, cannot perfect an appellant's belated attempt to invest it with jurisdiction. Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436, 150 S.E.2d 618 (1966). This Court has always refused to sanction a practice which requires that it ignore jurisdictional statutes and......
-
Seaton v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...of the Appellate Practice Act. It eschewed the exactitude which had been required in earlier cases such as Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436, 150 S.E.2d 618 (1966), which had resulted in dismissals. Instead, it expressly chose to "follow the route ... toward less technical an......
-
G. M. J. v. State
...judgment with a certificate, reduced to writing and entered by filing with the clerk. Code Ann. § 6-701; Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436, 150 S.E.2d 618; Williams v. Keebler, 222 Ga. 437, 150 S.E.2d 674; Davis v. Davis, 224 Ga. 740, 164 S.E.2d 816; Hurst v. Starr, 226 Ga. 4......
-
Hodge v. Dixon, 43997
...Laboratories, Inc., 260 F.2d 431, 435. We cannot determine what the trial judge intended except by what he said. Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436, 150 S.E.2d 618. Moreover, intention is not sufficient, but actual performance is required by the statute. The judgment not being......