Israel v. Carolina Bar-B-Que, Inc., BAR-B-QU
| Decision Date | 07 October 1987 |
| Docket Number | B-Q,INC,BAR-B-QU |
| Parties | Charlotte H. ISRAEL, Petitioner, v. CAROLINAand Andrew Berry, Trustee of Berry Brothers Trust, Defendants, Of whom Carolina Bar-ue, Inc. and Berry Brothers Trust, against which verdict was rendered, referred to in judgment as Andrew Berry, Trustee of Berry Brothers, Inc. are Respondents. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
ORDER
Prior report: 356 S.E.2d 1230.
Respondent Berry's return to the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 55. Further, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Epps v. US
...dangerous condition"). 7 In Israel v. Carolina Bar-B-Que, Inc., 292 S.C. 282, 356 S.E.2d 123, 127 (S.C.App.), cert. denied, 293 S.C. 406, 360 S.E.2d 824 (1987); the court of appeals held inter alia that "a landowner in a residential or urban area has a duty to others outside of his land to ......
-
Ford v. South Carolina Dept. of Transp., 2725
...did not endanger a highway. In Israel v. Carolina Bar-B-Que, Inc., 292 S.C. 282, 356 S.E.2d 123 (Ct.App.1987), cert. denied, 293 S.C. 406, 360 S.E.2d 824 (1987), this court adopted the rule that a landowner in a residential or urban area has a duty to others outside the property to prevent ......
-
Estate of Cantrell by Cantrell v. Green, 1559
...(1936). As this Court recognized in Israel v. Carolina Bar-B-Que, Inc., 292 S.C. 282, 356 S.E.2d 123 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 293 S.C. 406, 360 S.E.2d 824 (1987), an owner of a large tract of rural land is not under the same duty of inspection as one who owns or occupies urban property. Alt......
-
Larimore v. Carolina Power & Light
...is considered invitee). 8. Israel v. Carolina Bar-B-Que, Inc., 292 S.C. 282, 289, 356 S.E.2d 123, 128 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 293 S.C. 406, 360 S.E.2d 824 (1987) (citation 9. Callander v. Charleston Doughnut Corp., 305 S.C. 123, 406 S.E.2d 361 (1991). 10. Henderson v. St. Francis Community......
Request a trial to view additional results