Jackson County v. Hall, KCD
Decision Date | 31 October 1977 |
Docket Number | No. KCD,KCD |
Parties | JACKSON COUNTY, Missouri, Appellant, v. Norma Jean HALL, Respondent. 28490. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Willard B. Bunch, County Counselor, Tom J. Helms, Sp. County Counselor, Kansas City, for appellant.
Robert L. Langdon, Lexington, for respondent; Bradley, Skelton & Schelp, Lexington, of counsel.
Before SWOFFORD, C. J., DIXON, J., and PRITCHARD, P. J.
By an amended petition filed February 13, 1973, Jackson County sought to condemn approximately 85 acres of land owned by respondent for public use for a project known as the "Mouth of the Little Blue Park." The property lies to the southeast of the confluence of the Little Blue River and the Missouri River, northwesterly from Sibley in eastern Jackson County, Missouri.
The principal issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit Jackson County further to amend its petition on the day of trial, September 29, 1975, to reserve to respondent an easement of ingress and egress 25 feet in width from the termination of Galvin Road on the north and then running along a road on top of an existing levee in a southeasterly direction, "limited to agricultural and farm machinery, farm vehicles and equipment and for no other use" to respondent's remaining 120 acres. The 120 acres was partially landlocked without the levee road for farm machinery use because of the insufficiency of two bridges over the railroad right-of-way on Patton Road which runs north along the southeastern side of the 120 acres.
Counsel for Jackson County first asked for a continuance, which was denied, stating to the court that this was the first time it had come to his attention that respondent was relying upon remainder damages because of the limitation of access to the remaining 120 acres. After the jury was selected, Jackson County offered this amendment:
At the time the amendment was offered, respondent objected upon the grounds that it was Further objection was lodged against the timeliness of the proposed amendment, that the jury had been picked, awaiting opening statements, that the case had been prepared by respondent based upon the existing pleadings, which had been on file since 1973.
Jackson County relies upon several cases which say that it is an abuse of discretion for a trial court to refuse an amendment to a petition in condemnation where the amendment seeks to take less or fewer rights from the condemnee. See the leading case of St. Louis K. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Clark, 121 Mo. 169, 25 S.W. 192 (banc 1893), where by way of offered stipulation, the railroad would construct and maintain for the use of the landowner, his heirs and assigns, two crossings located as the landowner should select, each 24 feet wide, with planks securely spiked to crossties, spaces to be filled with macadam or gravel to a depth of not less than 6 inches. The court sustained an objection to the offered stipulation, and the case was tried on the theory that the landowner was not entitled to have a crossing or crossings. Held, the court erred in excluding the stipulation because: 25 S.W. 198 (Brackets added.) The facts of the Clark case, the offering of an easement to reduce the damage occasioned by the condemnation, are analogous to the facts here. See also State ex rel. Highway Commission v. Wright, 312 S.W.2d 70, 73-74(3) (Mo.1958); Union Electric Co. v. Levin, 304 S.W.2d 478, 483 (Mo.App.1957); State ex rel. Morton v. Allison, 357...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arthur E. Selnick Assocs., Inc. v. Howard Cnty. Md.
...(access easement to endure “for so long as other suitable way of egress and ingress is not available”)); accord Jackson County v. Hall, 558 S.W.2d 791, 792 (Mo.Ct.App.1977) (easement that “shall terminate if and when the two bridges located over the ... right-of-way ... are repaired, improv......
-
State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n v. McCann
...for such purpose can constitute an abuse of discretion. Joe D. Esther, Inc., 579 S.W.2d 155, 157 (Mo.App.1979); Jackson County v. Hall, 558 S.W.2d 791, 793 (Mo.App.1977). A condemnor may not amend after the commissioners have reported, however, to add lands, or otherwise change the issues s......
-
City of Blue Springs, Mo. v. Central Development Ass'n
...description or a change in plan in a condemnation petition may be taken care of adequately by amendment. See also Jackson County v. Hall, 558 S.W.2d 791, 793 (Mo.App.1977), where this court held it was an abuse of the trial court's discretion not to permit condemnor to amend its petition on......
-
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Joe D. Esther, Inc., s. 10672
...to condemn an access which it claimed it had already acquired. The Western District considered a similar question in Jackson County v. Hall, 558 S.W.2d 791 (Mo.App.1977), and in ruling the trial court erred in denying an amendment to a condemnation petition said at 793: " . . . (D)elay in a......