Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
Decision Date | 17 June 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 4D14–991.,4D14–991. |
Citation | 169 So.3d 194 |
Parties | Debra JARVIS, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for GSR 2006–OA–1, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jacqulyn Mack of The Mack Law Firm, Englewood, for appellant.
Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Celia C. Falzone of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, for appellee.
Debra Jarvis (“Homeowner”) appeals a final judgment of foreclosure. We find merit in her argument that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”) lacked standing at the time it filed its foreclosure complaint. On this basis, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On May 14, 2009, Deutsche Bank filed its complaint, seeking to reform the mortgage and to foreclose on the mortgage. It attached to the complaint a copy of the mortgage and a copy of the note. The copy of the note listed the lender as America's Wholesale Lender and contained no indorsements. The original note, introduced at trial, also contained no indorsements.
At trial, Deutsche Bank relied on a Pooling and Servicing Agreement (“PSA”) to argue that it had standing at the time it filed its complaint. Specifically, one of Deutsche Bank's witnesses testified that it had standing because “[t]he loan was entered into the trust shortly after origination, and we also have business records that show that they were in possession of the note.” Put more simply, the witness stated Deutsche Bank was entitled to enforce the note “through possession.”
Homeowner moved for an involuntary dismissal of the action, arguing that Deutsche Bank failed to prove it had standing at the time it filed its complaint. The trial court denied the motion, but later granted Homeowner's motion for involuntary dismissal on Count I (reformation of mortgage) and entered a final judgment of foreclosure on Count II.
“We review the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to bring a foreclosure action de novo. ” Lacombe v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 149 So.3d 152, 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ). “[S]tanding must be established as of the time of filing the foreclosure complaint.” Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So.3d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). “A plaintiff who is not the original lender may establish standing to foreclose a mortgage loan by submitting a note with a blank or special endorsement, an assignment of the note, or an affidavit otherwise proving the plaintiff's status as the holder of the note.” Id. (citing McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ).1
Here, Deutsche Bank failed to establish standing using any of these available methods. The original note contained no blank or special indorsements, and Deutsche Bank did not introduce into evidence an assignment. Further, evidence that the note was physically transferred into a trust prior to Deutsche Bank filing its foreclosure complaint does not, by itself, establish standing. See Kiefert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 153 So.3d 351, 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Segall v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.
...1st DCA 2014) ). “[S]tanding must be established as of the time of filing the foreclosure complaint.” Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 169 So.3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (alteration in original) (quoting Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So.3d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ). A......
-
Shaffer v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust
...to the trustee." Balch v. LaSalle Bank N.A., 171 So.3d 207, 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; see also Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 169 So.3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ("[E]vidence that the note was physically transferred into a trust prior to Deutsche Bank filing its foreclosure compl......
-
Monnot v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n
...prior to [the plaintiff] filing its foreclosure complaint does not, by itself, establish standing." Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 169 So.3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).The bank simply failed to prove standing because it failed to prove that it possessed the original note endorse......
-
Lewis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 4D14–815.
...was insufficient to establish the bank's standing to bring suit at the time the suit was filed. See Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat.'l Trust Co., 169 So.3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Balch v. LaSalle Bank N.A., 171 So.3d 207, 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Perez v. Deutsche Bank Nat.'l Trust Co.......
-
Chapter 4-4 Proving Standing Through an Indorsement
...2016).[36] Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Marciano, 190 So. 3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).[37] Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 169 So. 3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding that evidence that the note was physically transferred into a trust prior to the bank filing its foreclosur......
-
Chapter 4-4 Proving Standing Through an Indorsement
...standing); see also HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Alejandre, 219 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).[34] Jarvis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 169 So. 3d 194, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding that evidence that the note was physically transferred into a trust prior to the bank filing its foreclosur......