JIHL Associates v. Frank

Decision Date14 January 1985
Citation484 N.Y.S.2d 29,107 A.D.2d 662
PartiesJIHL ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. Seymour B. FRANK, et al., Defendants Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, National General Corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Jacobson & Goldberg, Garden City (Richard E. Schrier, Garden City, of counsel, William E.M. Gottfried, Garden City, on the brief), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph F. Carlino, P.C., Mineola (Arlen K. Bostad and Julian Jawitz, Mineola, of counsel), for third-party defendants-appellants.

Reisman, Peirez & Reisman, Garden City (David H. Peirez and Robert M. Calica, Garden City, of counsel), for respondent.

Before BROWN, J.P., and NIEHOFF, RUBIN and EIBER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action by a lessor to, inter alia, recover damages for alleged breaches of leases, the defendants third-party plaintiffs and the third-party defendants National General Corporation, Fox Eastern Theatres Corporation, Mann Theatres Corporation of California, National General Theatres, Inc., Fox Midwest Theatres, Inc. and Fox Inter-Mountain Theatres, Inc. (hereinafter third-party defendants), appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 13, 1983, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike the defendants third-party plaintiffs' demand for a jury trial and transferred the case from the trial calendar of a jury part to that of a nonjury part.

Order modified by adding thereto a provision severing so much of the plaintiff's third and sixth causes of action as seek to recover damages against the individual defendants Seymour B. Frank and Sidney Sinetar, and directing that said portions of those causes of action be tried separately before a jury. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term granted the motion of the plaintiff lessor to strike defendants' demand for a jury trial of every cause of action pleaded in the complaint, predicated upon a provision in the subject leases which stated that the

"Lessor and Lessee * * * waive * * * trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim brought by either of the parties hereto against the other on any matters whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this lease, the relationship of the Landlord and Tenant Lessee's use or occupancy of said premises, or any claim of injury or damage".

Said provision was allegedly incorporated by reference into subleases and subsequent assignments of the subleases.

Defendants and third-party defendants contend that the jury waiver provisions are void under section 259-c of the Real Property Law.

Section 259-c invalidates such a jury waiver provision in "any action for personal injury or property damage". That provision is not applicable to an action to recover damages arising out of a breach of the contractual provisions of the lease because the words "personal injury or property damage" traditionally refer to "tort actions arising out of a liability imposed by law for negligence, or even a willful tort, but not out of a contract" (se...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of U.S., Inc. v. State
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 18, 1990
    ...the common law (Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Conway, 11 N.Y.2d 367, 370, 229 N.Y.S.2d 740, 183 N.E.2d 754, supra; JIHL Assocs. v. Frank, 107 A.D.2d 662, 663, 484 N.Y.S.2d 29) and is not entitled to a jury trial under article I, § 2 of the New York Constitution. That incidental fees and cha......
  • 81 Franklin Co. v. Ginaccini
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • October 29, 1990
    ... ... Assoc. v. Frank, 107 A.D.2d 662, ... 663, 484 N.Y.S.2d 29 (2d Dep't 1985), quoting, Lindenwood Realty Co. v ... ...
  • Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of U.S., Inc. v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 20, 1989
    ...of this provision (see, Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Conway, 11 N.Y.2d 367, 370, 229 N.Y.S.2d 740, 183 N.E.2d 754; JIHL Assoc. v. Frank, 107 A.D.2d 662, 663, 484 N.Y.S.2d 29; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac. pp 4101.02, 4101.08). While this distinction is easier stated than applied, ......
  • Herman Miller, Inc. v. Thom Rock Realty Co., LP
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 9, 1993
    ...to personal property" refers only to damage claims based on tortious conduct, not on breach of contract. In J.I.H.L. Assoc. v. Frank, 107 A.D.2d 662, 484 N.Y.S.2d 29 (2d Dep't 1984) the Second Department held that the statute applied only to actions sounding in Section 259-c invalidates suc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT