Jjr 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte
| Decision Date | 22 March 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 05CA2553.,05CA2553. |
| Citation | 160 P.3d 365 |
| Parties | JJR 1, LLC; John H. Davis and Cheryl Phillips, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MT. CRESTED BUTTE, a municipal corporation, and Lagniappe Development, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Moreland Properties, LLC v. City of Thornton
...enough discretion that the outcome is not determined a priori by adherence to the procedure. See, e.g., JJR 1 LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365, 369-71 (Colo. Ct.App.2007) (finding no property interest in the outcome of a building permit application procedure where the procedure afford......
-
Bartnick v. City of Englewood
...unless there exists no set of circumstances in which the statute can be constitutionally applied) See also JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365, 372 (Colo.App. 2007). The American Heritage Dictionary defines "household" as follows: "a domestic unit consisting of the members of a fa......
-
Safe Streets Alliance v. Alt. Holistic Healing, LLC
...does not have a constitutionally recognized property interest in the preservation of scenic views. See, e.g., JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365, 371 (Colo. App. 2007). More to the point, any adverse effect on the Reillys' scenic views constitutes an intangible harm that falls ou......
-
Petersen v. City
...by Riverton City, the Petersens' case is readily distinguishable from Moreland and is more analogous to JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365, 369–71 (Colo.Ct.App.2007), and Hillside Cmty. Church v. Olson, 58 P.3d 1021, 1027–29 (Colo.2002), which support the determination that the P......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 10 - § 10.1 • EASEMENTS
...jurisdiction recognizes a landowner's right to acquire an easement of light by prescription."). See also JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365 (Colo. App. 2007) (no property right created by Town Code requiring Town to take scenic views into account).[205] Weisiger v. Harbour, 62 P.......
-
Rule 57 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS.
...relief under this rule that seek review of quasi-judicial decisions must be filed within 30 days. JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365 (Colo. App. 2007). The granting of declaratory relief is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and is not precluded even when......
-
Rule 106 FORMS OF WRITS ABOLISHED.
...because plaintiffs did not file their complaint until August 23, 2005, they exceeded the 30-day deadline. JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365 (Colo. App. 2007). Plaintiffs' claim for declaratory relief asserting that planning commission did not provide sufficient notice to them of......
-
APPEALS FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT DECISIONS
...Boulder, 577 P.2d 277 (Colo. 1978); Powers v. Larimer County Comm'rs, 651 P.2d 463 (Colo. App. 1982).[74] JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested Butte, 160 P.3d 365 (Colo. App. 2007).[75] Prairie Dog Advocates v. City of Lakewood, 20 P.3d 1203 (Colo. App. 2000). See also Vagneur v. City of Aspen, 295 P.......
Request a trial to view additional results